July 2014: Beware the Snake Oil Salesman
While preparing for an upcoming investment book of record (IBOR) webcast recently, I was chatting with the CIO of a large New York-based buy-side firm about his experiences to date with what is undoubtedly the hottest topic on the buy side at the moment, even though some might describe it as over-hyped. He explained that he had been intimately involved with the extensive and laborious ground work that his firm had conducted in preparation for the long haul toward its ultimate goal of producing accurate, transparent and reliable start-of-day and intra-day positions for its small army of portfolio managers and traders, with the view to enhancing their ability to make more judicious investment decisions on behalf of their clients. He explained that while technology plays a crucial and undeniable role in allowing the firm to convert theory into practice, it’s also important to acknowledge that for complex and often protracted projects like those that typically involve the development of an IBOR, third-party vendor-provided, off-the-shelf solutions that can be implemented “out-of-the-box” simply do not exist, and that any vendor making such claims should be treated with same skepticism as a snake oil salesman.
One would assume that anyone who has risen to the helm of their firm’s technology hierarchy would be well-versed in dealing with the myriad vendors serving the capital markets, evaluating their wares, and possessing a “BS” radar sensitive enough to discern practical advice from spurious claims. But, given that the above scenario is a recurring theme with many of the CIOs I have spoken to over the years, it appears that not all technology heads have developed this ability.
For a financial technology publication like Waters that has close ties with the third-party vendor community, this sentiment might sound like heresy. But as far as I am aware, the publication, launched over two decades ago, has never espoused the view that technology alone is the panacea for all maladies. What we do focus on, however, is the importance for vendors to genuinely understand the nature of their client’s business, the extent and the vagaries of the technology and operational challenges they face, the client’s desired end-goal, and perhaps most importantly, the collaborative and consultative approach to arriving at that destination, which involves no small amount of hand-holding well after the contracts have been inked. Any vendor that does not understand that it’s not just about the technology, is no more useful in the long run than a purveyor of snake oil, and should be dealt with accordingly.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
Bond tape hopefuls size up commercial risks as FCA finalizes tender
Consolidated tape bidders say the UK regulator is set to imminently publish crucial final details around technical specifications and data licensing arrangements for the finished infrastructure.
If M&A picks up, who’s on the auction block?
Waters Wrap: With projections that mergers and acquisitions are geared to pick back up in 2025, Anthony reads the tea leaves of 25 of this year’s deals to predict which vendors might be most valuable.
The Waters Cooler: A little crime never hurt nobody
Do you guys remember that 2006 Pitchfork review of Shine On by Jet?
Removal of Chevron spells t-r-o-u-b-l-e for the C-A-T
Citadel Securities and the American Securities Association are suing the SEC to limit the Consolidated Audit Trail, and their case may be aided by the removal of a key piece of the agency’s legislative power earlier this year.
After acquisitions, Exegy looks to consolidated offering for further gains
With Vela Trading Systems and Enyx now settled under one roof, the vendor’s strategy is to be a provider across the full trade lifecycle and flex its muscles in the world of FPGAs.
Enough with the ‘Bloomberg Killers’ already
Waters Wrap: Anthony interviews LSEG’s Dean Berry about the Workspace platform, and provides his own thoughts on how that platform and the Terminal have been portrayed over the last few months.
BofA deploys equities tech stack for e-FX
The bank is trying to get ahead of the pack with its new algo and e-FX offerings.
Pre- and post-trade TCA: Why does it matter?
How CP+ powers TCA to deliver real-time insights and improve trade performance in complex markets.