May 2014: Regulators’ Arbitrary Line in the Sand
![victor-anderson-portrait victor-anderson-portrait](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/912/271912/victor-anderson-portrait.jpg.webp?h=ec4f65b5&itok=iURTO8hM)
How fast is too fast? That’s a question a lot of people have been pondering for some time, and thanks to the release of Michael Lewis’ Flash Boys, it seems that just about everyone has an opinion on high-speed trading (HFT). I am finding Flash Boys particularly stimulating, even though I am distinctly uncomfortable with Lewis’ disparaging description of RBC’s acquisition of Carlin Financial and his overt character assassination of Jeremy Frommer, the firm’s founder and CEO. I’m not defending Frommer—I don’t know him, nor do I want to—but I also don’t think it’s particularly ethical or savory to be so blatantly boorish. I think it’s safe to say that Lewis and Brad Katsuyama, his primary source for the book, have been crossed off RBC’s and Frommer’s Christmas-card list for the foreseeable future.
This issue is not peculiar to the capital markets, however. In track and field, for example, the International Amateur Athletics Federation—an anachronism if ever there was one, given that all international athletes these days are professionals—has adopted the 0.100-second rule for starts up to and including the 400 meters, meaning that athletes reacting to the starting gun within that timeframe are deemed to have false-started due to their “physiologically impossible” reaction times. A similar, seemingly arbitrary rule cannot be applied to the capital markets, however, where machines are responsible for reacting to market stimuli in moments so fleetingly swift that they make humans appear sloth-like.
In his column, Max Bowie argues that while HFT practices are still, amazingly, misunderstood in certain circles, drawing a line in the sand and effectively penalizing those firms that have deployed the technology and services that provide them with an edge over their rivals, risks standing in the way of progress. Max reasons that an advantage only becomes an unfair one when technologies or services are withheld from certain market participants.
In the current HFT debate, this is clearly not the case. Some might argue, however, that the underlying costs associated with the practice are prohibitive to some firms, although the same rationale could be applied to the industry’s most in-demand portfolio managers and traders in terms of their remuneration packages. Perhaps the regulators will introduce a draft system similar to the one currently used in the NFL, where weaker teams, determined by their previous season’s performance, get first pick of the new crop of talent. This would certainly render the capital markets playing field more equitable. And from there, it’s just a hop, skip and a jump to socialism.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
JP Morgan touts DLT, tokens for collateral management
Distributed-ledger technology could make moving non-cash collateral more efficient, said managing director Toks Oyebode during an Isda conference on Thursday.
Waters Wrap: The changing definition and perception of blockchain
Anthony says that questions of definition and perception are killing DLT projects in the capital markets—oh, and a lack of proven implementations.
BlackRock to integrate Aladdin and Preqin to create new private markets platform
CEO Larry Fink calls combining the two platforms “maybe the biggest opportunity in 10 years.”
Ace high or busted flush? Digital Asset’s mixed fortunes mirror DLT adversity
The vendor hoped to remodel post-trade using blockchain technology—and it still might—but its bumpy progress raises questions over the future of DLT in finance.
This Week: BlackRock/Preqin, Trading Technologies, FIA Tech and more
A summary of some of the past week’s financial technology news.
Adaptive’s Aeron goes live on Microsoft Azure Marketplace
The messaging software used for building bespoke trading platforms is now available on Microsoft’s marketplace, making it accessible through major cloud providers.
Bloomberg, industry bodies push back on Cboe’s proposed OEMS rule change
Some industry bodies disagree with the options exchange’s proposal to carve its Silexx OEMS out of the SEC’s definition of an exchange facility and place it into a separate business line.
Waters Wrap: CME, Google and the pursuit of ultra-low-latency trading
CME Group and Google have announced Aurora, Illinois, as the location for the exchange’s new co-location facility. Anthony explains why this is more than just the next phase of the two companies’ originally announced project.