The Business of Upsetting Apple Carts
![james-rundle-waters james-rundle-waters](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/283/261283/james-rundle-waters.jpg.webp?h=4a6b0616&itok=EjSrsvc6)
Because, and let's not beat around the bush, it is. $20,000 per year for a terminal is a lot of money, regardless of the network it provides access to. It's just the gross distortion of cost versus value in the commercial world, regardless of industry, that lets people justify it. Also, of course, there isn't really any competition. Or there wasn't, until Markit announced that most of the major banks have signed up for its federated chat service.
It's something that's been bounded around the newsroom for a while, mostly from Inside Market Data's desks, but a few more details have been made official today. It will have an open directory, use video and chat rooms as well as traditional instant messaging, and be able to transmit documents across platforms. Also, if anyone had any doubts that Markit was squaring up to Bloomberg, the partnership with Thomson Reuters puts those very firmly in the ground.
Signs and Portents
I mean, it's all competition, right? Someone makes a good product, that product corners the market, derivative (in the pejorative sense) products nip at its heels until someone improves on the formula and makes something better. Repeat ad nauseam, and boom, capitalism. Or ‘innovation', at least. Bloomberg, also, took a bit of a pounding this year from Goldman Sachs's merciless pursuit of them after it turned out their reporters had been looking at things they shouldn't have, leading them to break their own rule (again) about commenting on themselves in a very public mea culpa. Trust, though, as the adage goes, takes a lifetime to build and moments to break.
It's not surprising, then, that Markit has come out with this. But it did take someone with Markit's emergent scale, resources, connections and technology to be able to effectively counter a giant like Bloomberg. If Goldman is, as popular myth goes, the vampire squid of the financial industry, then surely Bloomberg is the same for the financial information industry. It's in every shop, every floor, every desk and every installation, in all financial centers. Instant Bloomberg is undoubtedly the dominant chat platform. Whether Markit is able to make inroads, or remain a peripheral tool, remains to be seen. But it's in the spirit of the system to shake things up now and again.
There are factors for success, such as technical capabilities, network reach, user proliferation and, of course, cost. But there are others at play, as well. As much as people like to complain about tools and technologies they use, familiarity is a powerful pull. Yes, it also breeds contempt, but moving people away from something they've been used to for a long time is a remarkably difficult exercise.
It did take someone with Markit's emergent scale, resources, connections and technology to be able to effectively counter a giant like Bloomberg.
An example: At a magazine I worked in a freelance capacity for, before Waters, we changed the entire back end of the website to a different platform. I forget the specifics, but I think it was a proprietary system to a highly modified form of WordPress. Myself and the section editors thought it was superb─the functionality was richer, it was faster, it may have required a little more fiddling around, but we immediately noticed an uptick in traffic after we shifted onto it. The reporters, though, particularly the older hands, were in a state of near-open mutiny for months after. Despite how much they'd complained about the achingly slow, antediluvian content management system before, they were used to it. They knew what would cause it to freeze, to work, when it was likely to be quick and when it would be slow. It was familiar. They didn't want the hassle of learning an entirely new system, and some weren't too capable of it, either. *
That may be a challenge Markit faces, despite its efforts at cross-platform integration. People are used to Bloomberg, and users themselves may not really care how much it costs, as long as it works.
*Incidentally, three years later, I heard that a similar outcry occurred in that same newsroom, when they shifted from the new platform to an even newer one. Take from that what you will, but reporters are clearly fickle creatures.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
JP Morgan’s goal of STP in loans materializes on Versana’s platform
The accomplishment highlights the budding digitization of private credit, though it’s still a long road ahead.
As data volumes explode, expect more outages
Waters Wrap: At least for those unprepared—though preparation is no easy task—says Anthony.
This Week: ICE Bonds and MarketAxess plan to connect liquidity networks, TS Imagine, Bloomberg, and more
A summary of the latest financial technology news.
Industry associations say ECB cloud guidelines clash with EU’s Dora
Responses from industry participants on the European Central Bank’s guidelines are expected in the coming weeks.
CrowdStrike outage spurs rethink on ‘critical’ vendors
Some want US regulators to designate tech firms that pose risks to financial stability
This Week: ISI buys EPFR; Bloomberg, Warsaw Exchange, Fenergo and more
A summary of the latest financial technology news
US Supreme Court clips SEC’s wings with recent rulings
The Supreme Court made a host of decisions at the start of July that spell trouble for regulators—including the SEC.
TMX’s indexing pivot bears first fruit
The acquisition of index provider VettaFi has boosted revenues in the exchange’s analytics division, but further growth could mean taking on the heavyweight data providers like S&P, FTSE Russell, and MSCI.