SEFs Are Only One Part of the Swaps Equation
After all, it's not just the execution that's designed to reduce systemic risk. Central clearing plays an integral role. FIX plays an integral role. Market surveillance is critical, and value-added tools will hopefully provide some differentiation to the smaller SEFs, at a time when the larger players are starting to widen the gap. Market utilities, too, are becoming important, such as the pre-trade credit hubs operated by Traiana and MarkitSERV, who are going at each other hammer and tong for market share (part of which seems to be kindly reminders to reporters when there's a press release that they, too, operate a similar solution).
The data angle, though, is one that's not covered as much but is clearly on the mind of every participant. A huge aspect of the National Futures Association regulatory agreements, for instance, is getting data into a schema they can process before oversight begins. Others are cognizant of the sheer amount of information that will be streaming through to swap data repositories (SDRs), and the variety of formats that it'll take.
"The data sets reported are large and the reporting is frequent. The language is very rich and hence even with consistent enumeration of values, the values can occur in different levels of the schema," says one spokesperson at the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC). "There are also differences in data structures between SDRs which is apparent through the public data available. Convergence towards consistent reporting standards is therefore a key priority for the industry to enable and improve the analysis of the reported data."
Gathering Steam
The standardization question gains momentum, though, with its visibility. Even an operator such as Bloomberg, which runs its own SDR alongside a SEF offering, is aware that industry moves towards creating common standards are crucial for an effective and efficient operating environment.
"It is an important matter," says Ben Macdonald, head of product at Bloomberg. "We regularly communicate with clients and market participants about consistent reporting standards, and will continue to support these efforts as the industry drives towards standardization. The data sets for SDRs are generally well prescribed, which will help support consistent data standards."
There are also differences in data structures between SDRs which is apparent through the public data available. Convergence towards consistent reporting standards is therefore a key priority for the industry to enable and improve the analysis of the reported data.
It's these ancillary effects, and the slight attention they receive compared to the Polaroid parts of regulation, that have the tendency to cause the most disruption. Not just for participants, either, but for the regulators themselves, who are struggling with data as it is.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
IPC’s C-suite shuffle signals bigger changes for trader voice tech
Waters Wrap: After a series of personnel changes at the legacy provider, WatersTechnology examines what these moves might mean for the future of turrets and trader voice.
WatersTechnology latest edition
Check out our latest edition, plus more than 12 years of our best content.
From no chance to no brainer: Inside outsourced trading’s buy-side charm offensive
Previously regarded with hesitancy and suspicion by the buy side, four asset managers explain their reasons for embracing outsourced trading.
Band-aids vs build-outs: Best practices for exchange software migrations
Heetesh Rawal writes that legacy exchange systems are under pressure to scale to support new asset classes and greater volumes, leaving exchange operators with a stark choice: patch up outdated systems and hope for the best or embark on risky but rewarding replacement projects.
Portfolio trading vs RFQ: Understanding transaction costs in US investment-grade bonds
The MarketAxess research team explores how such factors as order size, liquidity profiles and associated costs determine whether a portfolio trade or an RFQ list trade is the optimal choice.
IEX, MEMX spar over new exchange’s now-approved infrastructure model
As more exchanges look to operate around-the-clock venues, the disagreement has put the practices of market tech infrastructure providers under a microscope.
The Waters Cooler: The Thanksgiving debrief
Maybe we shouldn’t use AI for EVERYTHING! I’m talking to YOU, Spotify!
LSEG shelves replatforming project for FX Matching venues
After EBS migration, dealers had little appetite for another major technology project