The Continued Convergence of the OMS, EMS
![anthony-malakian-waters anthony-malakian-waters](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/216/142216/anthony-malakian-waters.jpg.webp?h=373a525f&itok=zNeqXFEa)
The line between a hedge fund or asset manager's order management system (OMS) and execution management system (EMS) has been blurring for quite some time. As Dallas Lundy, head equity trader at asset manager Atlanta Capital, told my colleague Jake Thomases last year, "Having all these things in front of you allows you to be faster and more efficient by having your eyes focused in a very limited amount of space, with more data in front of you."
Consultancy Tabb Group recently released a survey of 52 buy-side firms, which showed a fairly even split between asset managers and hedge funds. In that survey, 50 percent of respondents say OMS and EMS functionality should be merged, with 44 percent saying they should not. The other 6 percent were on the fence.
Clearly, there is no consensus on this debate. But the current trend is that buy-siders are working toward consolidating the number of EMSs on their desktops. According to Tabb, in 2006 the average number of EMSs on a trader's desktop was 6.3. In 2012, that number was down to 1.5.
And to address this downsizing, buy-side spending on EMSs has steadily increased since 2009. In 2013, Tabb estimates that hedge funds will spend $166 million on EMSs and asset managers will spend $119 million. In 2009, those numbers were $138 million and $92 million between hedge funds and asset managers, respectively. Since 2009, those numbers have risen every year.
The winners in this OMS–EMS conversion will be the vendors that can prove they provide complementary functionality, rather than too much overlap.
Functionality has to be the main focus in order to convince a trader to go through the painful process of an OMS/EMS switch. Combining those functionalities into a streamlined system is the differentiator.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
Ace high or busted flush? Digital Asset’s mixed fortunes mirror DLT adversity
The vendor hoped to remodel post-trade using blockchain technology—and it still might—but its bumpy progress raises questions over the future of DLT in finance.
This Week: BlackRock/Preqin, Trading Technologies, FIA Tech and more
A summary of some of the past week’s financial technology news.
Adaptive’s Aeron goes live on Microsoft Azure Marketplace
The messaging software used for building bespoke trading platforms is now available on Microsoft’s marketplace, making it accessible through major cloud providers.
Bloomberg, industry bodies push back on Cboe’s proposed OEMS rule change
Some industry bodies disagree with the options exchange’s proposal to carve its Silexx OEMS out of the SEC’s definition of an exchange facility and place it into a separate business line.
Waters Wrap: CME, Google and the pursuit of ultra-low-latency trading
CME Group and Google have announced Aurora, Illinois, as the location for the exchange’s new co-location facility. Anthony explains why this is more than just the next phase of the two companies’ originally announced project.
WatersTechnology latest edition
Check out our latest edition, plus more than 12 years of our best content.
Natixis refines in-house interoperability model
The French asset manager has refined its canonical data model over the last decade, as the interoperability movement continues to evolve.
Zeros and ones: Industry contemplates T+0 as the next step
With the North American transition to T+1 settlement complete, same-day settlement could be the next goalpost set, though skeptics are many.