High-Frequency Trading special report
Click here to download the PDF
Is the Gain Worth the Pain?
If you had to point your finger at the single most controversial and emotive issue currently in the financial services industry, high-frequency trading (HFT) would be it. But that's understandable, thanks primarily to the May 6, 2010 Flash Crash, which overnight thrust the HFT industry-not just in the US, but globally-into the spotlight. And, as a result of a number of other "loss" incidents since then, HFT has, rightly or wrongly, been blamed for a bewildering array of the industry's woes, which, in turn, has drawn disproportionate scrutiny from global regulators. That, too, is understandable, given regulators' primary remits, regardless of their geographic location and jurisdictions: to ensure a fair, transparent and reliable marketplace for participants of all shapes and sizes to trade financial instruments.
It is therefore safe to assume we're going to see at least some level of regulation impinging on the HFT market, although quite when that regulation is going to be introduced, how invasive it might turn out to be, and what it will look like in its final form in terms of the specific practices it seeks to curtail, is anyone's guess.
In the Q&A section of this special report on page 10, respondents discuss the technology implications for firms looking to establish HFT environments by reducing latency throughout their networks; the extent to which HFT has permeated other asset classes over and above its equity stronghold; and the likelihood of invasive regulatory controls, which, while necessary to ensure an orderly marketplace, might affect the efficacy of HFT strategies to the point that firms might decide the gain simply isn't worth their pain. Granted, HFT is not for everyone-long-only asset managers are, for example, interested in anything but HFT. But if you consider that as much as 70 percent of all equity volume in the US market is executed in an HFT environment, losing market participants will have a marked impact across the global financial markets.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
Expanded oversight for tech or a rollback? 2025 set to be big for regulators
From GenAI oversight to DORA and the CAT to off-channel communication, the last 12 months set the stage for larger regulatory conversations in 2025.
DORA flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
IPC’s C-suite shuffle signals bigger changes for trader voice tech
Waters Wrap: After a series of personnel changes at the legacy provider, WatersTechnology examines what these moves might mean for the future of turrets and trader voice.
WatersTechnology latest edition
Check out our latest edition, plus more than 12 years of our best content.
From no chance to no brainer: Inside outsourced trading’s buy-side charm offensive
Previously regarded with hesitancy and suspicion by the buy side, four asset managers explain their reasons for embracing outsourced trading.
Band-aids vs build-outs: Best practices for exchange software migrations
Heetesh Rawal writes that legacy exchange systems are under pressure to scale to support new asset classes and greater volumes, leaving exchange operators with a stark choice: patch up outdated systems and hope for the best or embark on risky but rewarding replacement projects.
Portfolio trading vs RFQ: Understanding transaction costs in US investment-grade bonds
The MarketAxess research team explores how such factors as order size, liquidity profiles and associated costs determine whether a portfolio trade or an RFQ list trade is the optimal choice.
IEX, MEMX spar over new exchange’s now-approved infrastructure model
As more exchanges look to operate around-the-clock venues, the disagreement has put the practices of market tech infrastructure providers under a microscope.