Michael Shashoua: In Japan, Half Measures Don’t Pay
The Tokyo securities markets’ resistance to outside participants and influences extends into the realm of market and reference data. This became apparent on listening to participants speaking at last month’s Tokyo Financial Information Summit sponsored by Inside Market Data and Inside Reference Data, and from speaking personally to some market professionals while in Tokyo for the conference.
In the data world, the differences arise particularly in local market data vendors having an advantage over foreign providers, and centralization of data being difficult to implement. The context of data itself in the Tokyo markets is different. The Tokyo Stock Exchange still conducts about 95 percent of the trading in the market, with outside proprietary trading systems (PTSs)—the Japanese equivalent of ECNs and ATSs—not penetrating that market the way their counterparts have in many other regions. The TSE does not permit some parties to gain advantages over others by co-locating their servers at the exchange’s facilities. Co-location does exist, but the transmission times are artificially kept equal.
Language Barrier
Furthermore, tick data itself is different than in many other markets because there are rarely decimals involved. The values of securities are so large in the yen currency that the smallest increment is often no lower than one yen. And Tokyo markets and their data are all conducted in the Japanese language, which makes it challenging for outside data vendors to break into the market if they have not developed the ability to accommodate data in the Japanese language. The language barrier also creates a challenge for banks and financial firms looking to consolidate data feeds for more accurate management of both market and reference data.
Being fluent in Japanese is crucial to the fortunes of any market data vendors, as Raymond Yeung, head of technology products at Nikko Asset Management, explained during the conference. Providers have to go “all in,” and failing to do so just doesn’t cut it. Yeung has seen this when hearing from vendors who approach the market by opening an office in Hong Kong, and holding off hiring Japanese speakers until they can get a client, unwittingly making it certain they will never get the needed client.
So for now, foreign players with designs on the Japanese market have to figure out how to handle and manage market information that naturally will be localized, distinct and unique to Japan. For large investment firms, centralizing data would normally help better manage it, but this can be a non-starter in the Japanese environment. Hideyuki Kato, manager of the reference data management office at Mizuho Securities, advocates a virtual centralization approach, a middle ground between centralization and localization, to reconcile the benefits of centralization with the localized data of Japan’s markets.
The Humble Approach
The difficulty that outside data services providers experienced when entering the Japanese markets is similar to the difficulty foreign financial services firms as a whole have had entering Japan, and the reasons for those difficulties are similar. As one industry executive noted during the conference, an outsider thinking they can dictate from the top down how to conduct operations and get a good response will be disappointed. Practitioners have to enter the game with some humility and respect, and work out ways to interact and develop systems within the rules and traditions of how Japanese markets work. With the country rebuilding and the markets rebounding now, following the earthquake and tsunami disaster six months ago, new opportunities are arising in meeting financial processing and disaster recovery related challenges discovered due to the turmoil. For foreign firms and providers who aren’t careful or knowledgeable in their approach, these opportunities could also slip away.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
Ace high or busted flush? Digital Asset’s mixed fortunes mirror DLT adversity
The vendor hoped to remodel post-trade using blockchain technology—and it still might—but its bumpy progress raises questions over the future of DLT in finance.
This Week: BlackRock/Preqin, Trading Technologies, FIA Tech and more
A summary of some of the past week’s financial technology news.
Adaptive’s Aeron goes live on Microsoft Azure Marketplace
The messaging software used for building bespoke trading platforms is now available on Microsoft’s marketplace, making it accessible through major cloud providers.
Bloomberg, industry bodies push back on Cboe’s proposed OEMS rule change
Some industry bodies disagree with the options exchange’s proposal to carve its Silexx OEMS out of the SEC’s definition of an exchange facility and place it into a separate business line.
Waters Wrap: CME, Google and the pursuit of ultra-low-latency trading
CME Group and Google have announced Aurora, Illinois, as the location for the exchange’s new co-location facility. Anthony explains why this is more than just the next phase of the two companies’ originally announced project.
WatersTechnology latest edition
Check out our latest edition, plus more than 12 years of our best content.
Natixis refines in-house interoperability model
The French asset manager has refined its canonical data model over the last decade, as the interoperability movement continues to evolve.
Zeros and ones: Industry contemplates T+0 as the next step
With the North American transition to T+1 settlement complete, same-day settlement could be the next goalpost set, though skeptics are many.