The End of the Road for the Exchange?

robdaly-headshot
Rob Daly, Sell-Side Technology

As the next step in the Deutsche Börse and NYSE Euronext merger draws near, I have been thinking about the future of the exchange business model and wondering whether it has reached its logical apex.

Looking at the largest global players, the common characteristics appear to be a diverse revenue stream derived from trading multiple asset classes in multiple geographies, market data licensing, listing operations, technology and services.

According to David Easthope, a research director with industry analyst firm Celent, the technology business will become a more important revenue stream for exchanges in the future. He sums up the current exchange environment quite nicely in his latest whitepaper Exchange 2.0: The Evolution of Exchange Technology in the Cash Markets.

It is not surprising that most exchange operators look to diversify their business as quickly as possible. At the very basic level, exchanges are transaction-based businesses. If they had monopolies on liquidity, this would not be a problem. But since most North American and European exchanges are competing with at least a handful of local competitors, it is a race to the bottom in terms of exchange fees. When you include the spiraling technology investment the exchanges need to make in order to keep the high-frequency traders happy, it is not a good business model. There are lower profit margins from competition, higher technology costs and a reliance on fewer clients – the high-frequency traders ─ to produce that revenue.

Is this what the markets were thinking when they decided to demutualize most exchanges? Yes, selling shares allowed the exchange operators to modernize the trading system and perform some much-needed upgrades. However, it has also pushed them to find as many new revenue streams as possible to support the core business.

Now the industry is seeing mergers based on cost synergies, or simply cost cutting. How viable are long-term business plans that focus simply on trimming the fat?

If the European regulators let the transatlantic exchange merger take place, it will be interesting to watch it play out.

 

 

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.

If M&A picks up, who’s on the auction block?

Waters Wrap: With projections that mergers and acquisitions are geared to pick back up in 2025, Anthony reads the tea leaves of 25 of this year’s deals to predict which vendors might be most valuable.

Removal of Chevron spells t-r-o-u-b-l-e for the C-A-T

Citadel Securities and the American Securities Association are suing the SEC to limit the Consolidated Audit Trail, and their case may be aided by the removal of a key piece of the agency’s legislative power earlier this year.

Enough with the ‘Bloomberg Killers’ already

Waters Wrap: Anthony interviews LSEG’s Dean Berry about the Workspace platform, and provides his own thoughts on how that platform and the Terminal have been portrayed over the last few months.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a WatersTechnology account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here