Hello from London!
Well...actually, by the time you read this, I will be continuing my barnstorming of Europe and will be on a flight to Belgrade, Serbia. Semantics.
While over in the UK - aside from almost being killed by buses and cabs that drive too close to the curb (on the wrong side of the road too) - I interviewed the co-founder of Majedie Asset Management, Simon Hazlitt, and the head of risk and finance technology for RBS, Scott Marcar. Additionally, on the day before I left for my European vacation, I interviewed Catherine Bessant, who heads global technology and operations at Bank of America.
What struck me was just how different these three people's opinions of technology were, although they came to the same conclusion as to what their greatest concern is - data management.
Hazlitt's only connection to technology is the partnerships he builds with third-party vendors. Everything at Majedie is done through the cloud in some form or another - the firm does not have a single person dedicated to IT. But for him, the all-encompassing function of his cloud strategy is to deliver data to Majedie's clients as quickly and reliably as possible.
Marcar is technologically proficient. He manages a large staff of technologists and fully believes in the ability of technology to make an organization great. He is in the midst of a massive data architecture overhaul that will - he hopes - turn RBS into the gem of The City.
Bessant had absolutely no background in technology prior to taking over her role inside BofA's global technology and operations unit. For her, "technology is the enablement of a bank, not the destination." But while her concern is how technology fits into the business structure of the Charlotte behemoth, using data to reduce risk - and revolutionizing the company's data infrastructure - is what she believes will make BofA great.
I found those three interviews fascinating. I never get tired of how different the people that make up the capital markets' elite technologists view that magical word - technology.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
IPC’s C-suite shuffle signals bigger changes for trader voice tech
Waters Wrap: After a series of personnel changes at the legacy provider, WatersTechnology examines what these moves might mean for the future of turrets and trader voice.
WatersTechnology latest edition
Check out our latest edition, plus more than 12 years of our best content.
From no chance to no brainer: Inside outsourced trading’s buy-side charm offensive
Previously regarded with hesitancy and suspicion by the buy side, four asset managers explain their reasons for embracing outsourced trading.
Band-aids vs build-outs: Best practices for exchange software migrations
Heetesh Rawal writes that legacy exchange systems are under pressure to scale to support new asset classes and greater volumes, leaving exchange operators with a stark choice: patch up outdated systems and hope for the best or embark on risky but rewarding replacement projects.
Portfolio trading vs RFQ: Understanding transaction costs in US investment-grade bonds
The MarketAxess research team explores how such factors as order size, liquidity profiles and associated costs determine whether a portfolio trade or an RFQ list trade is the optimal choice.
IEX, MEMX spar over new exchange’s now-approved infrastructure model
As more exchanges look to operate around-the-clock venues, the disagreement has put the practices of market tech infrastructure providers under a microscope.
The Waters Cooler: The Thanksgiving debrief
Maybe we shouldn’t use AI for EVERYTHING! I’m talking to YOU, Spotify!
LSEG shelves replatforming project for FX Matching venues
After EBS migration, dealers had little appetite for another major technology project