Opening Cross: Even When Latency Isn’t Crucial, It’s Still Crucial
Loathe latency? Sick of speed? Tired of timestamps? Too bad! The markets’ love affair with low latency is as hot as ever, and if you don’t get skin in the game, you risk being too slow to compete with the low-latency Lotharios and finding yourself alone at the bar (or exchange) with no one to talk to (or trade with).
Yes, it’s becoming harder—and for each increment, more expensive—for firms to differentiate themselves purely through latency as data speeds approach the physical boundaries of the laws of physics. But that doesn’t mean the issue will go away: whatever the next big differentiator turns out to be, each link in the chain will still have to attain and maintain maximum efficiency to keep everything else flowing smoothly.
At the heart of these efforts are the exchanges themselves, which are responsible for capturing quotes and trades and turning them into the data that drives the market. For example, Canadian exchange group TMX last week announced the completion of its TMXnet GTA (Greater Toronto Area) ultra-low-latency connectivity network between datacenters and firms inside the city of Toronto with roundtrip latency of between 300 and 400 microseconds (IMD, Nov. 6, 2010).
But while it’s important that any system or network perform at low latency once in production, rigorous latency testing beforehand—in the same way that one would test all other aspects of any new system before rolling it out—is crucial to a successful deployment. Therefore, after last year announcing that it would roll out a new, low-latency trading system, the Singapore Exchange is now making sure the system lives up to its billing by testing it—and the new co-location facility in which it will reside—using latency monitoring technology from Corvil.
Meanwhile, low-latency data and trading technology vendor QuantHouse is using Greenline Financial Technologies’ Latency Monitor product to manage latency over its QuantLink order-routing network, using the non-intrusive tools to generate real-time latency views without distorting the measurements, officials say.
Despite these best efforts, market data rarely flows as smoothly as everyone would like. One of the biggest obstacles is the sheer volume of data being funneled into the market. Last week, the Financial Information Forum announced new record data peaks for several exchange feeds, while comments by the European Union’s energy chief about the potential for nuclear disaster in Japan amid other market, macroeconomic and political concerns drove US equity and derivative data rates to new heights of 4.12 million messages per second, according to hardware ticker plant vendor Exegy’s MarketDataPeaks.com website.
But since only a fraction of these messages are actual executions compared to short-lived quotes that some argue do not provide genuine liquidity—forcing exchanges, vendors and consumers to build in additional headroom at vast expense to handle volumes of data that offer no value but which threaten to disrupt their operations if they don’t have sufficient capacity—a truly optimized market will need to include truly optimized trading and quoting activity.
This could involve ever-more sophisticated smart-order routers, or the use of analytics designed to identify liquidity (such as the Market Quality Reports that Transaction Auditing Group produces for Europe and now Canada) or to identify optimal times for intraday trading (such as the new features being incorporated into technical analysis provider TraderMade’s Maverick product), or even that incorporate other indicators such as trade ideas like those provided by YouDevise, which has acquired rival First Coverage.
But for each of these to function properly, maintaining the lowest latency for data delivery and response will still be key, even if latency itself is no longer seen as the main differentiator.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
IPC’s C-suite shuffle signals bigger changes for trader voice tech
Waters Wrap: After a series of personnel changes at the legacy provider, WatersTechnology examines what these moves might mean for the future of turrets and trader voice.
WatersTechnology latest edition
Check out our latest edition, plus more than 12 years of our best content.
From no chance to no brainer: Inside outsourced trading’s buy-side charm offensive
Previously regarded with hesitancy and suspicion by the buy side, four asset managers explain their reasons for embracing outsourced trading.
Band-aids vs build-outs: Best practices for exchange software migrations
Heetesh Rawal writes that legacy exchange systems are under pressure to scale to support new asset classes and greater volumes, leaving exchange operators with a stark choice: patch up outdated systems and hope for the best or embark on risky but rewarding replacement projects.
Portfolio trading vs RFQ: Understanding transaction costs in US investment-grade bonds
The MarketAxess research team explores how such factors as order size, liquidity profiles and associated costs determine whether a portfolio trade or an RFQ list trade is the optimal choice.
IEX, MEMX spar over new exchange’s now-approved infrastructure model
As more exchanges look to operate around-the-clock venues, the disagreement has put the practices of market tech infrastructure providers under a microscope.
The Waters Cooler: The Thanksgiving debrief
Maybe we shouldn’t use AI for EVERYTHING! I’m talking to YOU, Spotify!
LSEG shelves replatforming project for FX Matching venues
After EBS migration, dealers had little appetite for another major technology project