What Beer Can Teach Us About Financial IT

anthony-malakian-waters
Anthony Malakian, deputy editor, Buy-Side Technology

Believe it or not, having a beer at the pub last week got me thinking about financial IT. It was a pint of Samuel Adams' seasonal Winter Lager, which is only available each year during the winter months. It was pretty tasty, which isn’t surprising, since The Boston Beer Company, which produces Sam Adams, is a fine brewery.

But I noticed that this year’s version tasted different from last year’s. I can't put my finger on it, as it's impossible to conduct a taste test, but the brewery either lightened the ginger taste or upped the caramel malt—whatever they did, it seems more smooth and refined than previous incarnations.

How does this relate to financial IT, you ask? Well, it’s all about changing perceptions.

One common refrain that I hear from CIOs is that they are often unwilling to go back and give a vendor a second chance after a bad first impression, no matter the enhancements the vendor makes to its offering.

Sure, these technologists say, "We do our due diligence," and "If the price is improved …," or "If the enhancement is cutting-edge ...," then a second chance may be granted. But that first impression is so vital, not only in capturing and keeping a customer, but also in generating good word-of-mouth.

Earlier this week, I spoke to a contact at a vendor about a product that it will be releasing in the near future. He spoke of the two-year process of developing the product, keeping in mind the KISS concept: Keep It Simple, Stupid. His company didn't want to rush out something that wasn't ready to go.

With beer, you can win back customers if you enhance your offering, or if the consumer gives you a second chance after having a skunked brew. The same is true in financial IT.

But my question is this: In the vendor community, how much time and money has been wasted and lost due to rushing something out the door, or perhaps worse yet, fiddling with something that was about perfect only to louse the whole thing up?

Anyway, this is what I was pondering at the bar until the second intermission of a New York Rangers game ended. So I will leave it up to you, faithful readers, to send anecdotal responses to me at anthony.malakian@incisivemedia.com.

 

 

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.

If M&A picks up, who’s on the auction block?

Waters Wrap: With projections that mergers and acquisitions are geared to pick back up in 2025, Anthony reads the tea leaves of 25 of this year’s deals to predict which vendors might be most valuable.

Removal of Chevron spells t-r-o-u-b-l-e for the C-A-T

Citadel Securities and the American Securities Association are suing the SEC to limit the Consolidated Audit Trail, and their case may be aided by the removal of a key piece of the agency’s legislative power earlier this year.

Enough with the ‘Bloomberg Killers’ already

Waters Wrap: Anthony interviews LSEG’s Dean Berry about the Workspace platform, and provides his own thoughts on how that platform and the Terminal have been portrayed over the last few months.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a WatersTechnology account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here