Chevron’s absence leaves questions for elusive AI regulation in US

The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron deference presents unique considerations for potential AI rules.

In oral arguments held before the US Supreme Court for the Relentless, Inc v. Department of Commerce trial, Justice Elena Kagan posed a hypothetical: What if Congress enacts a sweeping artificial intelligence bill that has “all kinds of delegations” for an agency or agencies to regulate the new field of technology?

The idea isn’t outlandish, as President Biden and former President Trump have talked about regulating AI, and a bill working its way through California could have huge implications for

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Waterstechnology? View our subscription options

Register for free

Access two articles, our IMD and Waters Wraps, plus a member newsletter. Find out more.

All fields are mandatory unless otherwise highlighted.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a WatersTechnology account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here