Preparing for an Audit in the New Regulatory Regime

Nowhere are the changes more impactful than in valuations. Transparency into the underlying methodologies and assumptive drivers that determine evaluated prices are key to addressing the new requirements.
But preparing for an audit of your valuations entails more than just transparency ─ it requires an understanding of the regulatory climate as well as ensuring that senior management, compliance, risk, accounting,
legal, pricing, and other groups are aware of their responsibilities and possess the knowledge, training and resources to execute those responsibilities.
Regulatory Drivers
Recognizing that capital charges, margins, spread and basis risk, volatility, counterparty risk and other inputs rely on asset valuations, the SEC and PCAOB continue to raise the bar for disclosure and documentation around the valuations process as established by Topic 820. In particular, they are increasing scrutiny of auditors and the evidence collected and documented to support their audit opinions. As a result, companies are spending a great deal of time to deliver documented audit trails, independent valuation inputs, additional supporting data and detailed disclosures for pricing decisions. Firms should also be prepared to explain processes and valuation dynamics to both auditors and regulators, who may not have experience with or a deep understanding of those elements.
Quest for Transparency
Transparency has become the holy grail of valuations. Organizations seek information as "evidence" and/or protective "armor" for audits. Obtaining and providing transparency into the underlying assumptions and inputs that drive evaluated pricing ─ and being able to substantiate prices to regulators, auditors, stakeholders and end-users ─ is a key element of the ongoing valuation due diligence process. Valuations of securities are often obtained from independent third-party providers. However, responsibility for valuations cannot be delegated ─ it falls squarely on the shoulders of senior management, who are ultimately accountable for the accuracy and reliability of financial statements.
Demand More From Your Evaluated Pricing Provider
Transparency is critical to understanding the dynamics, inputs and challenges of evaluated pricing. But the ability to demonstrate that sound due-diligence procedures have been fully executed is equally important. Vendors that cannot adequately meet the heightened due diligence and documentation required expose all participants, including shareholders, to risk. With so much at stake, companies can and should expect more from their pricing and reference data providers in the way of clearly defined processes, documentation and an auditable justification of prices. This also includes being apprised of pricing methodology, policy or other changes in a timely fashion.
On a daily basis, pricing vendors typically provide security identifiers and a price. The SEC's and PCAOB's increased emphasis of auditor review of fair values means more information will be required, including, but not limited to, specifi c security details such as ongoing performance data, trade history, rating actions and market color.
In the spirit of full transparency, it is critical for pricing vendors to work with their clients through due diligence meetings and supplying the necessary additional information in a timely fashion.
Conclusion
The dynamics of the market will continue to drive regulatory change, impacting the type and amount of information firms are required to provide to regulators, auditors and stakeholders. This is no time for complacency. Reach out to your evaluated pricing vendors to learn about their processes, models and assumptions. Educate auditors so that they understand the input criteria that influence fair value. Communicate with senior management and shareholders. Imbue your operation with a "culture of compliance" that provides a greater level of
end-to-end control, support and transparency.
Jayme Fagas is head of evaluated pricing for the Americas at Thomson
Reuters.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Pisces season: Platform providers feed UK plan for private stock market
Several companies in the US and the UK are considering participating in a UK program to build a private stock market composed of separate trading platforms.
How to navigate regional nuances that complicate T+1 in Europe
European and UK firms face unique challenges in moving to T+1 settlement, writes Broadridge’s Carl Bennett, and they will need to follow a series of steps to ensure successful adoption by 2027.
Nasdaq leads push to reform options regulatory fee
A proposed rule change would pare costs for traders, raise them for banks, and defund smaller venues.
The CAT declawed as Citadel’s case reaches end game
The SEC reduced the CAT’s capacity to collect information on investors, in a move that will have knock-on effects for its ongoing funding model case with Citadel.
Waters Wavelength Ep. 305: Cato Institute's Jennifer Schulp
Jennifer joins to discuss what regulatory priorities might look under Paul Atkin's SEC.
Examining Cboe’s lawsuit appealing SEC’s OEMS rule rejection
The Chicago-based exchange has sued the regulator in the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals after the agency blocked a proposed rule that would change how Silexx is classified.
European exchange data prices surge, new study shows
The report analyzed market data prices and fee structures from 2017 to 2024 and found that fee schedules have increased exponentially. Several exchanges say the findings are misleading.
Regis-TR and the Emir Refit blame game
The reporting overhaul was been marred by problems at repositories, prompting calls to stagger future go-live dates.