Fintechs Firms May Soon Get Bank Charters
But for the moment, fintechs in the capital markets space will not be covered.
Even though fintechs in the capital markets space will not be covered at present, this could be a first step toward greater oversight for these companies.
Comptroller of the Currency Thomas J. Curry announced his office will take comments from the public before it decides on applications from fintech firms to get charters. Getting a special-purpose charter allows organizations to undertake some banking activities on a limited basis. This means firms can lend money, collect debt and issue debit cards. What special purpose banks cannot do, however, is trade in securities and commodities.
Curry said the decision to move forward with applications is a way to adapt to changing customer needs that have evolved as faster, more efficient, and more accessible products and services are in high demand.
"Fintech companies hold great potential to expand financial inclusion, empower consumers, and help families and business take more control of their financial matters," Curry said in a speech. "Chartering companies that are finding new and better ways of satisfying needs is another step toward supporting responsible innovation that is good for consumers, good for the federal banking system, and good for the country."
He also noted fintech firms will not be required to seek special-purpose charters but rather will have the option to do so, particularly if these companies do not want to partner with existing banks.
"They are trying to determine what regulatory bucket, if any, should be applicable to the various types of FinTech firms. It appears the regulators do not want to treat FinTech firms as square pegs to be forced into existing regulatory round holes." -- Richard Levin
For the purposes of the charters, the term "fintech" is defined broadly. Even the OCC notes that "fintech companies vary widely in their business models and product offerings. Some are marketplace lenders providing loans to consumers and small businesses, others offer payment-related services, others engage in digital currencies and distributed ledger technology, and still others provide financial planning and wealth management products and services."
The banking sector is the OCC's primary remit. The regulator notes that the number of fintech companies in the US and UK stands at over 4,000, and in just five years investment in this sector has grown from $1.8 billion to $24 billion worldwide. So the OCC's decision could have far-reaching effects.
A Sign of Things to Come?
The OCC's decision acknowledges that fintechs are already competing with national and state banks. Chartering these firms offers regulators the chance to openly vet risks.
Richard Levin, chair of fintech and regulation practice at law firm Polsinelli, tells WatersTechnology that the OCC seems to be making a distinction between certain technologies to see which ones fall into its purview. He says the OCC's formal proposal comes on the heels of other regulatory agencies openly questioning if the sector can, and should, be regulated.
"It is promising to see the OCC publish their paper on special-purpose bank charters, the Securities and Exchange Commission held a fintech forum, and the Federal Reserve recently issued a paper on distributed-ledger technology," Levin says. "They are trying to determine what regulatory bucket, if any, should be applicable to the various types of fintech firms. It appears the regulators do not want to treat fintech firms as square pegs to be forced into existing regulatory round holes."
Levin adds he doesn't consider what the OCC is proposing to be an overreach because it wants to deal only with a limited scope of banking and did not name high-frequency trading and distributed-ledger technology as areas it will look at.
For Levin, only firms with strong capital will be able to survive regulation so startups may have to shut down if they cannot comply.
Ability to Move
Bryan Hubbard, a spokesperson for the OCC, tells WatersTechnology the decision is not rule-making and the office will only use public comments to inform its decision when granting fintechs charters. He adds the OCC is not working on a timeline for chartering fintechs.
"This will give fintechs the ability to operate in all 50 states, relieving them of getting licenses in each state," he said. "It also gives them the value to say to stakeholders that they are regularly examined."
Regulators have recently turned their eye to the possible risks of the fintech boom. The Securities and Exchange Commission's Office of Compliance, Investigations and Examinations (OCIE) asked for additional resources to conduct examinations into stress testing, continuity planning, conflicts of interest, consumer data protection, and recordkeeping.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Emerging Technologies
The IMD Wrap: With Bloomberg’s headset app, you’ll never look at data the same way again
Max recently wrote about new developments being added to Bloomberg Pro for Vision. Today he gives a more personal perspective on the new technology.
LSEG unveils Workspace Teams, other products of Microsoft deal
The exchange revealed new developments in the ongoing Workspace/Teams collaboration as it works with Big Tech to improve trader workflows.
IBM report finds ‘shadow’ data significant contributor to data breaches
As AI and cloud take on greater importance in the capital markets, firms need to consider their threat impact zones.
Bloomberg adds AI earnings summaries to Apple Vision Pro app
The vendor continues to add content and functionality to its Bloomberg Pro for Vision app, which sits at the convergence of spatial and mobile computing.
SS&C continues Blue Prism rollout, eyes other acquisition targets
The company is focusing on organic growth while keeping its eye on potential acquisitions.
CME: CFTC OKs clearing move to Google Cloud
The CFTC has given the Chicago-based exchange approval to run its clearing and settlement infrastructure on the Google Cloud Platform, while the exchange and vendor have extended their partnership to last until at least 2037.
Once a blockchain cheerleader, Axoni changes its playbook
The fintech, whose origins can be traced back to the genesis of capital markets’ complicated flirtation with DLT, has largely ditched the tech as the foundation of its data synchronization offering, opting for more familiar territory.
The IMD Wrap: Quality drivers—the sticks and carrots accelerating the data quality race
Like a Formula One Grand Prix, data management is a race that can be won or lost. And just as each race is part of a larger F1 championship that pays large sums of TV money to the winning team, winning or losing one race can contribute to winning or losing an endgame with much more at stake.