Golden Copy: The €64,000 Question
ESMA fine of DTCC for neglecting reporting is curiously low
The €64,000 fine levied by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) on the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC) on March 31 is a curious action indeed for a regulatory body whose lack of preparedness recently led to a one-year delay in the effective date of the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II) regulation.
ESMA stated that the fine was issued because the DTCC was negligent in failing to set up systems and, in turn, provide derivatives data to the authority as required under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR).
Last year, a Dutch regulator, speaking about ESMA and EMIR issues, said there were issues with the quality of data provided to repositories, but at the same time said the volume of the data was so great that it was difficult to sort through it all and make sense of it. European regulators, in this instance, as with MiFID II reporting, lack the systems, personnel and wherewithal to handle what their rules demand.
To qualify as noteworthy, regulatory fines against the financial industry usually are in the millions or even billions of dollars. So, in that context, a €64,000 fine is significant because it's so low. One could read into this that ESMA leaders are conflicted about really punishing the DTCC for faults that their own organization has on an even bigger scale.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Waters Wavelength Ep. 342: LexisNexis Risk Solutions’ Sophie Lagouanelle
This week, Sophie Lagouanelle, chief product officer for financial crime compliance at LNRS, joins the podcast to discuss trends in the space moving into 2026.
Citadel Securities, BlackRock, Nasdaq mull tokenized equities’ impact on regulations
An SEC panel of broker-dealers, market-makers and crypto specialists debated the ramifications of a future with tokenized equities.
FIX Trading Community recommends data practices for European CTs
The industry association has published practices and workflows using FIX messaging standards for the upcoming EU consolidated tapes.
Interview: Linda Middleditch, Regnology
Regnology’s Linda Middleditch discusses its acquisition of Wolters Kluwer’s FRR business
Tokenized assets draw interest, but regulation lags behind
Regulators around the globe are showing increased interest in tokenization, but concretely identifying and implementing guardrails and ground rules for tokenized products has remained slow.
Waters Wavelength Ep. 341: Citi’s Pitts and Topa
This week, Citi’s Michele Pitts and Marcello Topa join Wei-Shen to talk about UK and EU T+1.
Why source code access is critical to DORA compliance
As DORA takes hold in EU, Adaptive’s Kevin Covington says that it is shining a light on the criticality of having access to source code.
Nasdaq’s blockchain proposal to SEC gets mixed reviews from peers
Public comment letters and interviews reveal that despite fervor for tokenization, industry stakeholders disagree on its value proposition.