December 2014: How Soft Are You?
![victor-anderson-portrait victor-anderson-portrait](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/912/271912/victor-anderson-portrait.jpg.webp?h=ec4f65b5&itok=iURTO8hM)
There was a story circulating in UK buy-side circles the best part of a decade ago about the CEO of a prominent and well-respected third-party technology provider who “lost it” when he learned that a prospective client had decided not to implement his firm’s product, instead opting for a rival’s offering. The story goes that the incensed CEO marched into the asset manager’s offices and confronted the firm’s CTO about his decision, in full view of other staff members, which was both embarrassing for the CTO and unprofessional on the part of the CEO. Apparently the CEO was “escorted” from the building by security, never to set foot on the premises again, tarnishing his reputation and that of his firm’s in the process.
It’s difficult establishing the veracity of this anecdote, given that I have yet to meet anyone who actually witnessed the incident first-hand, although I have met many in the industry familiar with the story, which suggests that there must at least be a grain of truth to it. I was reminded of that incident recently when chatting to an individual representing a technology firm that had entered this year’s Buy-Side Technology Awards about the outcome of one of the categories. He was indignant when he learned that his firm’s offering had not come out on top, given that “it has unquestionably the best technology, the most user-firms, and the most new contracts signed in the last year.”
Naturally, I wanted to test the validity of his claims, which I did by revisiting all of the entries in the category in question, only to find that not only were these claims spurious, but that a number of other entries had far better track records, not only over the past 12 months in terms of new clients signed, but also in terms of their total user-firm numbers. As for the assertion about possessing “the best technology,” that’s an area that’s not even worth investigating, given that anyone who knows the buy side—even superficially—would concede that there are no metrics that allow anyone to claim with any validity that one product has “better” technology than any other. All offerings have their attributes, which certain buy-side firms might find appealing given their technical, budgetary, and operational requirements, but there never is and nor will there be a product that satisfies every buy-side firm’s needs.
As I’ve written before, I’d go a step further and argue that possessing great technology really only means that you’re invited to the game, but it definitely doesn’t mean you’re going to win it. For that, you need soft skills, which, when considering the above example, is clearly not a prerequisite for all the technology providers in our industry.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Emerging Technologies
Startup helps buy-side firms retain ‘control’ over analytics
ExeQution Analytics provides a structured and flexible analytics framework based on the q programming language that can be integrated with kdb+ platforms.
The IMD Wrap: With Bloomberg’s headset app, you’ll never look at data the same way again
Max recently wrote about new developments being added to Bloomberg Pro for Vision. Today he gives a more personal perspective on the new technology.
LSEG unveils Workspace Teams, other products of Microsoft deal
The exchange revealed new developments in the ongoing Workspace/Teams collaboration as it works with Big Tech to improve trader workflows.
IBM report finds ‘shadow’ data significant contributor to data breaches
As AI and cloud take on greater importance in the capital markets, firms need to consider their threat impact zones.
Bloomberg adds AI earnings summaries to Apple Vision Pro app
The vendor continues to add content and functionality to its Bloomberg Pro for Vision app, which sits at the convergence of spatial and mobile computing.
SS&C continues Blue Prism rollout, eyes other acquisition targets
The company is focusing on organic growth while keeping its eye on potential acquisitions.
CME: CFTC OKs clearing move to Google Cloud
The CFTC has given the Chicago-based exchange approval to run its clearing and settlement infrastructure on the Google Cloud Platform, while the exchange and vendor have extended their partnership to last until at least 2037.
Once a blockchain cheerleader, Axoni changes its playbook
The fintech, whose origins can be traced back to the genesis of capital markets’ complicated flirtation with DLT, has largely ditched the tech as the foundation of its data synchronization offering, opting for more familiar territory.