EU Regulators Emphasize Cyber Risk in Joint Report
The committee comprises the European Securities and Markets Authority (Esma), European Banking Agency, and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority. In the Joint Committee Report on Risks and Vulnerabilities in the EU Financial System, the JCESA highlights a number of areas where firms must focus their attention. These include regularly checking and updating systems through proper maintenance, which it says does not happen to a sufficient standard, as well as provisioning for cyber security appropriately in annual budgets. Moreover, the joint committee says, gauging cyber risk should be built into standard risk-assessement frameworks, along with continuing to measure the overall resilience of an institution and its business continuity plans.
"Cyber and IT risks should be regarded as important components of operational risk, and institutions should consider holding capital against them," the report states. "Nevertheless, holding capital should not be regarded as a substitute for the sound management of operational risk, such as sound IT governance and management, mature IT processes, IT quality assurance, and effective IT security management. The evolving nature of cyber threats increases the need for sound management practices and a strong, professional risk culture in financial institutions which can react to new threats and deliver appropriate levels of employee awareness about new risks."
The joint committee is the latest regulatory entity to warn against the risk from cyber threats. Recently, the Bank of England reported on a simulation where the financial infrastructure of the UK came under attack, following on from similar events held in the US through the Quantum Dawn series of exercises.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
IPC’s C-suite shuffle signals bigger changes for trader voice tech
Waters Wrap: After a series of personnel changes at the legacy provider, WatersTechnology examines what these moves might mean for the future of turrets and trader voice.
WatersTechnology latest edition
Check out our latest edition, plus more than 12 years of our best content.
From no chance to no brainer: Inside outsourced trading’s buy-side charm offensive
Previously regarded with hesitancy and suspicion by the buy side, four asset managers explain their reasons for embracing outsourced trading.
Band-aids vs build-outs: Best practices for exchange software migrations
Heetesh Rawal writes that legacy exchange systems are under pressure to scale to support new asset classes and greater volumes, leaving exchange operators with a stark choice: patch up outdated systems and hope for the best or embark on risky but rewarding replacement projects.
Portfolio trading vs RFQ: Understanding transaction costs in US investment-grade bonds
The MarketAxess research team explores how such factors as order size, liquidity profiles and associated costs determine whether a portfolio trade or an RFQ list trade is the optimal choice.
IEX, MEMX spar over new exchange’s now-approved infrastructure model
As more exchanges look to operate around-the-clock venues, the disagreement has put the practices of market tech infrastructure providers under a microscope.
The Waters Cooler: The Thanksgiving debrief
Maybe we shouldn’t use AI for EVERYTHING! I’m talking to YOU, Spotify!
LSEG shelves replatforming project for FX Matching venues
After EBS migration, dealers had little appetite for another major technology project