When is a Data Utility Not Really a Data Utility?
![nicholas-hamilton nicholas-hamilton](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/766/194766/nicholas-hamilton-580x358.jpg.webp?itok=j8oxjOCp)
As more vendors announce their plans to overhaul traditional approaches to data management, the terms ‘utility' and ‘managed service' are increasingly being used interchangeably. However, there is a distinction between the two.
A utility is a multi-tenant environment in which data is aggregated and cleansed once, and the same golden copy is then provided to multiple users. This model is attractive because it is more efficient and therefore cheaper than the common scenario, in which a vendor does the same data management work separately for each of its clients— who, in fact, all have the same requirements.
Like a utility, a managed service has a central, shared platform and operations team, which help to create economies of scale. However, the difference is that the data produced by a utility is completely standardized—exactly the same for all consumers— whereas a managed service produces a bespoke golden copy, tailored to the needs of individual users.
As discussions about utilities progress, it is becoming clear they face a number of obstacles. Utilities are well suited to the management of public-domain data, which they can redistribute freely, but they face a much harder time when dealing with data that is subject to a license.
Some data vendors are happy for the operators of utilities to take their data, manage it and redistribute it to the users of the utility. But the data vendors will, of course, require the users of the utility to pay them for the data they receive. As a result, the utilities have to install metering systems and controls.
Some observers believe that to really qualify as a utility, its operators must source the data themselves, so that it is not subject to redistribution licenses—a requirement that certainly raises the bar for all would-be data utilities.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
‘Feature, not a bug’: Bloomberg makes the case for Figi
Bloomberg created the Figi identifier, but ceded all its rights to the Object Management Group 10 years ago. Here, Bloomberg’s Richard Robinson and Steve Meizanis write to dispel what they believe to be misconceptions about Figi and the FDTA.
SS&C builds data mesh to unite acquired platforms
The vendor is using GenAI and APIs as part of the ongoing project.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
Where have all the exchange platform providers gone?
The IMD Wrap: Running an exchange is a profitable business. The margins on market data sales alone can be staggering. And since every exchange needs a reliable and efficient exchange technology stack, Max asks why more vendors aren’t diving into this space.
Reading the bones: Citi, BNY, Morgan Stanley invest in AI, alt data, & private markets
Investment arms at large US banks are taken with emerging technologies such as generative AI, alternative and unstructured data, and private markets as they look to partner with, acquire, and invest in leading startups.
The costly sanctions risks hiding in your supply chain
In an age of geopolitical instability and rising fines, financial firms need to dig deep into the securities they invest in and the issuing company’s network of suppliers and associates.
JP Morgan’s goal of STP in loans materializes on Versana’s platform
The accomplishment highlights the budding digitization of private credit, though it’s still a long road ahead.
As data volumes explode, expect more outages
Waters Wrap: At least for those unprepared—though preparation is no easy task—says Anthony.