Master and Commander

Type the word ‘emir' into Google today, and you'll bring up a host of articles related to the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (Emir). But that wasn't the case even a few months ago, when the dictionary entry for the word appeared first, and financial regulation far down the list.
The word ‘emir', after all, has a lengthy history. In Islamic spheres, it means an independent ruler, a military commander, or a descendent of Muhammad, peace be upon him. It can denote political rank in some countries, such as Qatar or Turkey.
In European finance, of course, it represents a large-scale reform of derivatives trading on the continent, being part of the multi-pronged approach to overhauling the securities markets here. The reporting requirements that had caused such consternation in the buildup came into force last week, but despite a few hiccups, it seems to have gone okay.
Building Blocks
The problems with Emir are fairly typical of the problems with regulatory reform over the past few years, in that they have been rushed through without a proper appreciation of the consequences and the necessary moving parts needed to keep the engine running. With Emir, for instance, the amount of confusion over necessary aspects such as the pre-legal entity identifier and the unique trade identifier (UTI) has been quite remarkable.
Despite being a necessary component for reporting, it's become clear that not everyone who needs to has registered for these identifiers, that the pace of issuance is lackluster in places, and when it comes to the UTI, there is no central governing standard, and people aren't sure what form it should take.
If a regulator has to say that, essentially, it won't enforce the regulation because it recognizes the impossibility of full compliance in the short term, that regulation should not be implemented yet.
The UK's Financial Conduct Authority has said that it will give firms a grace period for proper reporting, but the whole situation is, frankly, unacceptable. I'm not arguing against the regulation itself ─ indeed, I've long been of the opinion that more transparency, and a shift to technologically capable markets can only be a good thing. But that has to be tempered with realism. If a regulator has to say that, essentially, it won't enforce the regulation because it recognizes the impossibility of full compliance in the short term, that regulation should not be implemented yet.
No Action
You see this in the US all of the time, where bodies such as the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission issue no-action letters to say they will not be prosecuting firms for non-compliance. Granted, this is partly due to the legal structure of regulation in the US, where the law is made first and the rules after, as opposed to Europe, where the rules are made first and then come into law. But for such far-ranging regulations as the Dodd-Frank Act, Emir and the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive, there has to be concern that these are being rushed through without the due care and attention that is required.
It's important to progress in the regulatory process, of course, but doing so with what is blind disregard for the foundations not even being in place yet, or being slotted in for compliance dates, is foolhardy. It will lead to loopholes, arbitrage, and broken rules that ruin the opportunity of a generation to adapt the market framework to the market environment, taking into account the use of technology and the way in which it has changed how business is conducted.
And at the risk of putting the boot in too much on the regulatory side, let's not forget the woeful lack of preparation from some corners of the industry, either. More effort and engagement is needed on both sides.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Experts say HKEX’s plan for T+1 in 2025 is ‘sensible’
The exchange will continue providing core post-trade processing through CCASS but will engage with market participants on the service’s future as HKEX rolls out new OCP features.
No, no, no, and no: Overnight trading fails in SIP votes
The CTA and UTP operating committees voted yesterday on proposals from US exchanges to expand their trading hours and could not reach unanimous consensus.
Big xyt exploring bid to provide EU equities CT
So far, only one group, a consortium of the major European exchanges, has formally kept its hat in the ring to provide Europe’s consolidated tape for equities.
Jump Trading CIO: 24/7 trading ‘inevitable’
Execs from Jump, JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, and the DTCC say round-the-clock trading—whether five or seven days a week—is the future, but tech and data hurdles still exist.
Pisces season: Platform providers feed UK plan for private stock market
Several companies in the US and the UK are considering participating in a UK program to build a private stock market composed of separate trading platforms.
How to navigate regional nuances that complicate T+1 in Europe
European and UK firms face unique challenges in moving to T+1 settlement, writes Broadridge’s Carl Bennett, and they will need to follow a series of steps to ensure successful adoption by 2027.
Nasdaq leads push to reform options regulatory fee
A proposed rule change would pare costs for traders, raise them for banks, and defund smaller venues.
The CAT declawed as Citadel’s case reaches end game
The SEC reduced the CAT’s capacity to collect information on investors, in a move that will have knock-on effects for its ongoing funding model case with Citadel.