Market Surveillance special report
![waters-market-surveillance-report-dec2013 waters-market-surveillance-report-dec2013](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/760/277760/waters-market-surveillance-report-dec2013-580x358.JPG.webp?itok=D5BOiTFC)
Click here to download the PDF
Watchful Eyes
There's a popular statistic that's usually trotted out in any story about surveillance from the UK media, which claims that British citizens are caught on camera around 300 times per day. It's not hard to believe, given that this small, soggy island has over 4 million CCTV cameras in operation, by conservative estimates, at any one time-roughly one for every 16 people. If the average person feels like they're being watched, then they're not alone: Incoming regulations around market surveillance and communications recording for the financial services industry are definitely designed to make workers at banks know that everything they're doing is being monitored.
In an ideal world, this should make the job of market-surveillance analysts and compliance officers much easier. After all, with modern technology, voice records can be searched and correlated with market data around a particular trade, while complex-event processing (CEP) technology even offers the possibility of commingling unstructured data and spinning it through analytics engines to flag up causes for concern. Entire decision-making and action-reaction sequences can be reconstructed to provide a definitive look at not only how something took place during the course of the trading day, but why. As ITG's Michael Sparkes says in this report's virtual roundtable on page 4, when it comes to taking in vast quantities of data, it can sometimes feel like you can't see the wood for the trees. Knowing how to analyze data, and what you want to learn from it, is just as important as being able to do it in the first place.
This, more than anything else, is perhaps the greatest challenge for the function of market surveillance. Not only is it being forced to still perform its role in the midst of enormous changes in both market structure and practice, with the Balkanization of trading venues and the emergence of high-speed, high-frequency trading, but it also has to adapt and run with new technologies in the process. Maintaining a watchful eye across pre-trade, at-trade and post-trade cycles, in this context, becomes an enormous challenge. It's a necessary one, though, and it demands serious attention from all institutions. After all, the penalties for not monitoring trading activities to the very best of one's ability can be extreme, if the cautionary tales of the past few years are anything to go by.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
Ace high or busted flush? Digital Asset’s mixed fortunes mirror DLT adversity
The vendor hoped to remodel post-trade using blockchain technology—and it still might—but its bumpy progress raises questions over the future of DLT in finance.
This Week: BlackRock/Preqin, Trading Technologies, FIA Tech and more
A summary of some of the past week’s financial technology news.
Adaptive’s Aeron goes live on Microsoft Azure Marketplace
The messaging software used for building bespoke trading platforms is now available on Microsoft’s marketplace, making it accessible through major cloud providers.
Bloomberg, industry bodies push back on Cboe’s proposed OEMS rule change
Some industry bodies disagree with the options exchange’s proposal to carve its Silexx OEMS out of the SEC’s definition of an exchange facility and place it into a separate business line.
Waters Wrap: CME, Google and the pursuit of ultra-low-latency trading
CME Group and Google have announced Aurora, Illinois, as the location for the exchange’s new co-location facility. Anthony explains why this is more than just the next phase of the two companies’ originally announced project.
WatersTechnology latest edition
Check out our latest edition, plus more than 12 years of our best content.
Natixis refines in-house interoperability model
The French asset manager has refined its canonical data model over the last decade, as the interoperability movement continues to evolve.
Zeros and ones: Industry contemplates T+0 as the next step
With the North American transition to T+1 settlement complete, same-day settlement could be the next goalpost set, though skeptics are many.