The Silo Effect
![james-rundle james-rundle](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/765/194765/james-rundle-580x358.jpg.webp?itok=KSqZWuPJ)
Most people agree that sharing is a good thing. Part of this means spreading your data through an organization, whether that's through a system like an investment book of record (IBOR), a data-management platform or shared feeds with common APIs. For technology, it means not developing in isolation, doubling up on the same work, and creating cross-platform inefficiencies through myopic, proprietary engineering strands.
I've spoken to many, many people about this process of breaking down silos over the past few years, for any topic that you can think of. But while everyone seems to say, yes, break down the silos, there may be a case for them in some instances.
The typical one here is the mergers and acquisitions business, which by its very nature, is heavily segmented. This is not only for resource reasons, of course, but operational and risk ones too ─ firewalls have to be in place to prevent insider trading as a start. But depending on the scale of the operation, keeping siloes in place can be beneficial too. One representative from a vendor I spoke to last week, who previously worked in compliance at major banks and small interdealer brokers, said his job was helped in some ways by the stratification of internal structure. It made it easier for his specific remit, he said, that everything was already pigeon holed neatly, and that personnel from one division didn't have access to systems or data from others ─ in essence, it provided a bottleneck.
The Plan
Assuming that a segmented approach is the way forward, though, is ridiculous. Nobody wants to return to the days where teams would double up on data feeds (and fees) to develop platforms that were broadly similar in approach, or tools that did essentially the same thing but had twice the impact on a budget sheet.
But from a risk perspective, without sufficient planning, breaking down silos also carries a danger to the business. As with most things, they key is asking what you really want to achieve from revamping infrastructure before you start doing it because enterprise is king. For example, are you attempting to save costs, are you trying to aggregate your data across various departments that could use a common feed, are you trying to create a holistic view of positions and trade information so as to better manage your exposure, or are you laying the foundations for complex counterparty risk systems that will require vast resources to run Monte Carlo simulations all day? Those are reasons why, and they have future scope in mind.
Technologists are faced with the impossible Cassandratic equation of servicing while savanting. Breaking down operational and technological siloes, while attractive, needs to be done with a clear goal in mind, lest it create more complexity and development corridors itself.
Most banks I speak to, particularly in the UK, talk about technology in the future tense. Of course they're developing now, but the budget doesn't just cover now, it has to cover years ahead, and factor in the idea that there may not be cash five years hence to undergo radical change. Technologists are faced with the impossible Cassandratic equation of servicing while savanting. Breaking down operational and technological siloes, while attractive, needs to be done with a clear goal in mind, lest it create more complexity and development corridors itself.
This week's side note: How about that Orange Business Services ─ Trading Solutions acquisition announcement, eh?
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
Facing platform shutdown, former IEX Cloud head buys its assets in 11th-hour bid
Tim Baker, Pedro Aguayo, and a silent partner have come together to purchase IEX Cloud’s assets days before the exchange was to retire all its products on August 31.
New working group to create open framework for managing rising market data costs
Substantive Research is putting together a working group of market data-consuming firms with the aim of crafting quantitative metrics for market data cost avoidance.
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Back to basics: Data management woes continue for the buy side
Data management platform Fencore helps investment managers resolve symptoms of not having a central data layer.
‘Feature, not a bug’: Bloomberg makes the case for Figi
Bloomberg created the Figi identifier, but ceded all its rights to the Object Management Group 10 years ago. Here, Bloomberg’s Richard Robinson and Steve Meizanis write to dispel what they believe to be misconceptions about Figi and the FDTA.
SS&C builds data mesh to unite acquired platforms
The vendor is using GenAI and APIs as part of the ongoing project.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
Where have all the exchange platform providers gone?
The IMD Wrap: Running an exchange is a profitable business. The margins on market data sales alone can be staggering. And since every exchange needs a reliable and efficient exchange technology stack, Max asks why more vendors aren’t diving into this space.