June 2013: Nothing Typical About the Buy Side
The typical buy-side firm: Now there’s a concept that’s sure to polarize opinion and yield more questions than answers. But it is a notion that we tend to talk a lot about, especially when it comes to firms’ technology needs and the way they go about procuring that technology. However, pretty much anyone who has followed the capital markets for any length of time would agree that when it comes to amassing the elements comprising the typical buy-side firm, the number of exceptions to any proposed rule makes rulemaking in this context a trivial exercise.
And here’s why: The Man Group, for example, one of the largest hedge fund groups globally, is what many would call a typical buy-side firm. The same could be said of Manhattan-based BlackRock, the largest buy-side firm in the industry, with more than $3.5 trillion under management. Man and BlackRock are as different as chalk and cheese. Then there are the large mutual funds in the US market, which also fall under the buy-side umbrella. And let’s not forget the endowment funds and pension plans on both sides of the Atlantic, many of which have fully fledged, in-house asset management operations that can stand toe-to-toe with most specialist investment managers when it comes to their level of money-management expertise and the sophistication of the technology underpinning the business—they’re also buy-side firms. And then there are the smaller, niche players, not only in terms of assets under management and headcount, but also according to their operational scope, and, in some but not all cases, the relative “simplicity” of their investment strategies. All of the above are buy-side firms, and all are very different animals, although one isn’t necessarily any more representative of the buy side than any other.
But it is when we consider buy-side firms’ technology needs and uses that things get really complicated. Consider this: An organization like the Man Group has a CIO—Mike Wright—who is supported by a small army of technologists. Man’s technology needs and consumer behavior are determined to a large degree, but not exclusively, by a mix of drivers, all of them present in one form or another within all buy-side firms: the firm’s business needs; its existing technology stack; the combined experience and expertise of its technologists; its technology budget; the acuteness of the need to get to market as soon as possible with new technologies; and the trade-off between developing technologies yielding a competitive advantage and those that are commoditized and supported by a third-party provider. The complex relationship between these variables is the DNA determining buy-side firms’ individuality, to the extent that attempting to identify a single organization as a representative of whole, is not only impractical—it’s also pointless.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Emerging Technologies
The Waters Cooler: Big Tech, big fines, big tunes
Amazon stumbles on genAI, Google gets fined more money than ever, and Eliot weighs in on the best James Bond film debate.
AI set to overhaul market data landscape by 2029, new study finds
A new report by Burton-Taylor says the intersection of advanced AI and market data has big implications for analytics, delivery, licensing, and more.
New Bloomberg study finds demand for election-related alt data
In a survey conducted with Coalition Greenwich, the data giant revealed a strong desire among asset managers, economists and analysts for more alternative data from the burgeoning prediction markets.
How ‘Bond gadgets’ make tackling data easier for regulators and traders
The IMD Wrap: Everyone loves the hype around AI, especially financial firms. And now, even regulators are getting in on the act. But first... “The name’s Bond; J-AI-mes Bond”
Waters Cooler: AI tells it like it is… or does it?
A weekly round-up of stories from us and beyond. Plus, fun Scottish facts.
Google teams up with Linklaters on GenAI contract analysis project
While the large language model is unique to Linklaters and legal documents, Google believes financial services firms will also benefit from GenAI when it comes to contract analysis.
Man Group’s head of risk engineering doesn’t trust ChatGPT for managing risk
Risk managers have a duty to know how AI is being used within their firms. At a recent event, execs from Man Group and others discussed the benefits and pitfalls of AI in risk management.
Banks seemingly build more than buy, but why?
Waters Wrap: A new report states that banks are increasingly enticed by the idea of building systems in-house, versus being locked into a long-term vendor contract. Anthony explores the reason for this shift.