Bloomberg Screws Up with Spying Scandal, But the End Ain't Near
Whenever Facebook makes a change to its privacy settings, it sends ripples of consternation throughout what seems like the entire world. Yet it’s not unusual to read diatribes about the indignity of such privacy breaches on—you guessed it—Facebook newsfeeds. Invariably, in spite of the changes, everyone carries on using the social media mainstay. Why? Because it's simply the best option out there.
Similiarly, for all the fuss being made about the fact that Bloomberg News reporters were using Bloomberg LP terminals to spy on Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan traders and brass—and untold others—not much is likely to change.
If they've already made the switch to—or have been long-time users of—Bloomberg terminals, will hedge fund and investment bank traders run back to Thomson Reuters or try and cobble together a Bloomberg-like terminal with data feeds and messaging? Maybe a few will—and they will be roundly jeered by their peers much like your friend who chose to get off the grid of Facebook because they were worried about Big Brother. “Oh, got it,” the trader’s colleagues will say. “Bloomberg reporters really care about whether you've logged on recently!”
As one contact of mine put it: "Doing the mail is hard."
There is heft to the claim that Bloomberg dominates Wall Street. Its terminals are ubiquitous and occupy a massive portion of trading desktop real estate. Its apps are sticky. And perhaps most importantly: Traders hate change.
So could Goldman Sachs get into the terminal business, as the New York Post reported? If anyone could, it's Goldman. But even so, that wouldn’t help the other 99.9 percent of firms out there.
To me, this is more a of a media/corporate ethics story. But will CEOs tell their IT teams to find a substitute for the Bloomberg terminal? I highly doubt it. After talking to several contacts this week, this is simply a juicy story that makes for good barroom talk.
The most likely outcome is that firms will require Bloomberg to alter their contracts to address privacy concerns.
There may come a day when Bloomberg loses its footing in the terminal space, but that day is not coming soon, and it certainly won’t happen because of an—admittedly boneheaded—blunder by Bloomberg’s news division.
Think I'm wrong? Is that a death knell off in the distance? Send an e-mail to me at anthony.malakian@incisivemedia.com or give me a call at +1 646-490-3973.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
IPC’s C-suite shuffle signals bigger changes for trader voice tech
Waters Wrap: After a series of personnel changes at the legacy provider, WatersTechnology examines what these moves might mean for the future of turrets and trader voice.
WatersTechnology latest edition
Check out our latest edition, plus more than 12 years of our best content.
From no chance to no brainer: Inside outsourced trading’s buy-side charm offensive
Previously regarded with hesitancy and suspicion by the buy side, four asset managers explain their reasons for embracing outsourced trading.
Band-aids vs build-outs: Best practices for exchange software migrations
Heetesh Rawal writes that legacy exchange systems are under pressure to scale to support new asset classes and greater volumes, leaving exchange operators with a stark choice: patch up outdated systems and hope for the best or embark on risky but rewarding replacement projects.
Portfolio trading vs RFQ: Understanding transaction costs in US investment-grade bonds
The MarketAxess research team explores how such factors as order size, liquidity profiles and associated costs determine whether a portfolio trade or an RFQ list trade is the optimal choice.
IEX, MEMX spar over new exchange’s now-approved infrastructure model
As more exchanges look to operate around-the-clock venues, the disagreement has put the practices of market tech infrastructure providers under a microscope.
The Waters Cooler: The Thanksgiving debrief
Maybe we shouldn’t use AI for EVERYTHING! I’m talking to YOU, Spotify!
LSEG shelves replatforming project for FX Matching venues
After EBS migration, dealers had little appetite for another major technology project