Corporate Actions Processing's Slow Boil
![michael-shashoua-waters michael-shashoua-waters](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/317/167317/michael-shashoua-waters.JPG.webp?h=acfe3244&itok=ceJMABf4)
In poll questions asked during Inside Reference Data's webcast last week concerning corporate actions issues, respondents indicated that reducing operational risk was an important priority driving greater automation. When asked to indicate which of several parts of the corporate actions lifecycle their firms had automated, 55% cited event management, while other parts of the cycle, such as position management (39%), election management (26%), and entitlement calculation and posting (24%) each had less than half or close to a quarter of respondents automating them.
These two sets of results are certainly consistent—if reducing operational risk is seen as the most important reason to automate corporate actions processing then it should follow that most firms will have event management systems in place before anything else. Managing positions, shareholder votes and dividend calculations are not as relevant to operational risk for companies.
But a question comes to mind. If our poll is truly representative of what's happening in the industry, is having event management systems in place at 55% of firms really enough to avoid serious operational risk issues arising when corporate actions are processed and the resulting data produced?
Maybe not. But it might be the best the industry can currently do, because so many asset managers still are using faxes for corporate actions, as Invesco's Joel Brown pointed out during the webcast. "Just because you're able to automate doesn't mean others in the chain are able to," he said.
Another reason why it may be hard to automate corporate actions events is because the events need to be managed, as Alan Jones of SmartStream noted in the webcast. The latter pieces of the process, after the action event, are less conducive to automation.
It is the exceptions that keep corporate actions professionals up at night, as Brown said. Perhaps certain aspects of preparing the event can be automated, which is why 55% say they have event management systems in place. But does corporate actions differ so much from other aspects of data management that it's the one place where automation is counterproductive?
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
JP Morgan touts DLT, tokens for collateral management
Distributed-ledger technology could make moving non-cash collateral more efficient, said managing director Toks Oyebode during an Isda conference on Thursday.
Waters Wrap: The changing definition and perception of blockchain
Anthony says that questions of definition and perception are killing DLT projects in the capital markets—oh, and a lack of proven implementations.
BlackRock to integrate Aladdin and Preqin to create new private markets platform
CEO Larry Fink calls combining the two platforms “maybe the biggest opportunity in 10 years.”
Ace high or busted flush? Digital Asset’s mixed fortunes mirror DLT adversity
The vendor hoped to remodel post-trade using blockchain technology—and it still might—but its bumpy progress raises questions over the future of DLT in finance.
This Week: BlackRock/Preqin, Trading Technologies, FIA Tech and more
A summary of some of the past week’s financial technology news.
Adaptive’s Aeron goes live on Microsoft Azure Marketplace
The messaging software used for building bespoke trading platforms is now available on Microsoft’s marketplace, making it accessible through major cloud providers.
Bloomberg, industry bodies push back on Cboe’s proposed OEMS rule change
Some industry bodies disagree with the options exchange’s proposal to carve its Silexx OEMS out of the SEC’s definition of an exchange facility and place it into a separate business line.
Waters Wrap: CME, Google and the pursuit of ultra-low-latency trading
CME Group and Google have announced Aurora, Illinois, as the location for the exchange’s new co-location facility. Anthony explains why this is more than just the next phase of the two companies’ originally announced project.