Is Grease The Word for Identifiers?
Inevitably, every costume shop that pops up in advance of Halloween here in New York will have some variation on the characters from "Grease"—a ‘50s Travolta-like greaser or a "Pink Lady" gang outfit. So I was struck by a remark made in our LEI webcast (to be summarized in a feature in the November print edition of Inside Reference Data going to press this week) that the legal entity identifier should be viewed as "strategic grease" for "the wheels" of the industry's reference data management.
This inventive turn of phrase was coined to describe how the LEI can eliminate friction coming from miscommunicated or confused fund names, market events or entity identifiers. But to listen to the webcast as a whole, or read our upcoming report, it looks like "strategic grease" still needs to be applied to getting firms to register for an LEI and be prepared to comply with the LEI standard.
Last month, we also identified another issue that may need some grease—intellectual property claims on the LEI. But more striking, polls taken during the webcast found that just 24% of our listeners (about 600 people tuned in) had registered themselves for an LEI, but 59% see implementation of the LEI as a strategic investment, rather than just a regulatory compliance requirement. In addition, 46% said combining their LEI projects with other projects designed to meet their firms' business requirements was the biggest hurdle they saw for meeting the LEI standard.
Judging by these numbers, which aren't a scientifically rigorous assessment, but still a good representative snapshot of what's happening in the industry, it appears that there is at least some understanding of the value of implementing the LEI. Some spur is needed, though, to propel firms to make the leap from just having an LEI to seeing the LEI as a strategic investment and getting it combined with high-priority business operations projects—the equivalent of Sandy showing up in the black bodysuit and getting Danny back at the end of that movie.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Bond tape hopefuls size up commercial risks as FCA finalizes tender
Consolidated tape bidders say the UK regulator is set to imminently publish crucial final details around technical specifications and data licensing arrangements for the finished infrastructure.
The Waters Cooler: A little crime never hurt nobody
Do you guys remember that 2006 Pitchfork review of Shine On by Jet?
Removal of Chevron spells t-r-o-u-b-l-e for the C-A-T
Citadel Securities and the American Securities Association are suing the SEC to limit the Consolidated Audit Trail, and their case may be aided by the removal of a key piece of the agency’s legislative power earlier this year.
BlackRock, BNY see T+1 success in industry collaboration, old frameworks
Industry testing and lessons from the last settlement change from T+3 to T+2 were some of the components that made the May transition run smoothly.
How ‘Bond gadgets’ make tackling data easier for regulators and traders
The IMD Wrap: Everyone loves the hype around AI, especially financial firms. And now, even regulators are getting in on the act. But first... “The name’s Bond; J-AI-mes Bond”
Can the EU and UK reach T+1 together?
Prompted by the North American migration, both jurisdictions are drawing up guidelines for reaching next-day settlement.
Waters Wavelength Ep. 293: Reference Data Drama
Tony and Reb discuss the Financial Data Transparency Act's proposed rules around identifiers and the industry reaction.
Clearing houses fear being classified as DORA third parties
As the 2025 deadline looms, CCP and exchange members are seeking risk information that’s usually deemed confidential.