Opening Cross: What Latency Isn’t...
![max-bowie max-bowie](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/807/101807/max-bowie-incisivemedia-color.jpg.webp?h=ee12d8fd&itok=FIjEj0Li)
Now that it’s becoming prohibitively expensive to truly be among the fastest players in the low-latency space, firms are finally realizing that trading isn’t a 100-meter sprint, but more of a “tough mudder,” and that speed alone isn’t a sustainable differentiator unless it’s accompanied by strategy.
Low latency isn’t a strategy; it’s an enabler of strategies. It makes you faster, not better. And over recent years, it has become the liquid courage of high-frequency traders, convincing some that they get smoother and smarter with every swig of latency they can drain from the glass, and that they can pick up any cute trade hanging out on the exchange book.
But now, firms are examining the rising costs of achieving low latency, especially in light of the need to spend elsewhere, on items such as improving data governance—an area where 67 percent of investment managers have weak processes in place, according to a new survey from benchmark data provider Rimes Technologies, conducted by consultancy InvestIT.
Hence, firms are more closely scrutinizing the role of latency—and how effective it delivers returns. And as it becomes harder to improve headline speed, the industry will step up its focus on other areas related to latency, said Azul Systems CTO Gil Tene, at the recent Inside Market Data Chicago conference, such as measuring and improving variability and predictability—something that CME Group is currently focusing on. Indeed, a whole industry has built up over the years around monitoring latency and jitter—though according to Peter Lankford, director of the Securities Technology Analysis Center, who presented at last week’s Buy-Side Technology conference in New York, many firms aren’t happy with the results and lack confidence in their levels of time synchronization.
Think of these efforts as tuning a high-powered engine. Low latency is like having the fastest engine, but a car also needs fast chassis and aerodynamic design, as well as a team boss to decide race strategy, a pit crew to change tires—ever-more important as algorithms’ lifespans get shorter and must be replaced more frequently—not to mention a driver who can execute the race strategy. Because races aren’t just won in a drag race on the straightaway, they’re won through teamwork, racecraft, and—just as in trading—the ability to spot opportunities and enter and exit positions to haul yourself up to the top spot ahead of the competition.
“It doesn’t matter how fast I am if someone makes a better decision around quantifying the markets and trades 30 seconds before me—your strategy is the best way to get faster, not hardware,” said Peter Nabicht, chief technology officer of Allston Trading at IMD Chicago.
Of course, if you can trade 30 seconds before a rival, you aren’t chasing ticks, but rather reading the trends: something that those with longer time horizons—from intraday to days, weeks or months—are well accustomed to.
Latency-sensitive firms that can’t stomach those horizons will likely move from a narrow focus on latency to looking at latency across every component of the data and trading process. For example, says Rob Walker, chief technology officer at FPGA-based feed handler vendor xCelor, “We work with clients to understand their problems—there’s no sense in using an FPGA card that saves microseconds if you are getting data in a way that introduces milliseconds.”
In short, low latency isn’t cheap and isn’t easy, but isn’t going away, either—instead becoming a basic requirement of trading, in the same way as order management systems and connectivity. Those prepared to settle for “good-enough” latency will expect more capabilities at the same low speeds, just as xCelor is shortening switching times of Altera hardware, to enable it to perform normalization processes on data that would previously have added extra latency. Going forward, it won’t be the raw speed, but how much you can do within those timeframes, that will make a difference.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
On GenAI, Citi moves from firm-wide ban to internal roll-out
The bank adopted three specific inward-facing use cases with a unified framework behind them.
FactSet-LiquidityBook: The buy-side OMS space continues to shrink
Waters Wrap: Anthony spoke with buy-side firms and industry experts to get a feel for how the market is reacting to this latest tie-up.
Examining Cboe’s lawsuit appealing SEC’s OEMS rule rejection
The Chicago-based exchange has sued the regulator in the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals after the agency blocked a proposed rule that would change how Silexx is classified.
Lucrative market data deal with LSEG fuels Tradeweb’s record quarter
The fixed-income trading venue realized gains from its 2023 deal with the London Stock Exchange Group, amid soaring revenues from market data providers industry-wide.
Is overnight equities trading a fad or the future?
Competition is heating up in US equity markets as more venues look to provide trading from twilight to dawn. But overnight trading has skeptics, and there are technical considerations to address.
We’re running out of datacenters! (But maybe AI can help?)
The IMD Wrap: Datacenter and cloud adoption is being pushed to its limits by AI. Will we simply run out of space and power building AIs before AI figures out how to fix it?
Regis-TR and the Emir Refit blame game
The reporting overhaul was been marred by problems at repositories, prompting calls to stagger future go-live dates.
Ongoing uncertainty, volatility force new tech approach to collateral management
With market volatility and geopolitical uncertainty here to stay, Nasdaq’s Gil Guillaumey argues that firms must rethink their approach to collateral management.