Off-Exchange Equity Trades Grow in March [UPDATE]

New research from the TABB Group has shown that the level of US equity trades executing off-exchange is growing.
In a commentary note, Tales From the Dark Side: Out of Sight but Very Much in Mind, the consultancy estimates that 32.96 percent of US equities trading in March was being performed outside of registered exchanges. [Tabb originally stated the volume at 37 percent, please see note below.] By comparison, the amount in 2008 was 15 percent.
TABB attributes the recipients of the flow as internalized trading, where brokers match orders between a firm's own desks, and dark pools, taking 24 percent and 13 percent respectively.
Increasing speeds of trading, sophistication of smart order routers, decreasing volumes in the equities markets, the cost of commissions, and technological development of both dark pools and internalization engines are all cited as reasons for the growth in off-exchange trading.
"Historically, trading desks were able to match buying and selling interest received concurrently on the desk," says the commentary, written by CEO Larry Tabb and research analyst Cheyenne Morgan. "As technology now allows messages to be sent and responded to in microseconds, trading desks can send out messages to solicit the other side of the trade. If an order can't be found directly, it then moves into the firm's dark pool. If still unable to be matched, the dark pool sends messages to a wider array of market participants to trade. If still unexecuted, the order is sent to other dark pools that message a wider group of traders. If by the time the order went through two or three different dark pools and messaging cycles and the order remained unexecuted, it would then go to the exchanges. This all occurs in a fraction of a second, all managed by a series of electronic routing engines."
Exchanges, in this day and age, only get orders that almost anyone in the professional community does not want.
The commentary also suggests that, as volumes of dark liquidity grow, the US Securities Exchange Commission is likely to take a far greater interest in the inner workings of these crossing networks. It also says, while exchanges are "furious" at what is happening, and some traders are unhappy with the information leakage, most see the benefits and savings of dark execution as outweighing message weight.
"Exchanges, in this day and age, only get orders that almost anyone in the professional community does not want," Tabb and Morgan add.
[Note: There was an error made in Tabb's original report. Here is Larry Tabb's statement:
Due to an error, the March percentage of order flow traded away from exchanges should have been 32.96 percent instead of the 37 percent we reported on April 9. This did not represent a historic high. Nevertheless, the error does not invalidate the concerns expressed in our comments about the rise in off-exchange trading.]
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
The TNS–Radianz deal hints at underlying issues in trader voice
Waters Wrap: As part of its cost-cutting program, BT shipped its Radianz unit to TNS, but the deal didn’t include its Trading & Command trader voice property. Anthony finds that interesting.
OEMS interest sputters
Combined order and execution management systems once offered great promise, but large buy-side firms increasingly want specialization, leaving OEMS vendors to chase smaller asset managers in a world of EMS consolidation.
FactSet adds MarketAxess CP+ data, LSEG files dismissal, BNY’s new AI lab, and more
The Waters Cooler: Synthetic data for LLM training, Dora confusion, GenAI’s ‘blind spots,’ and our 9/11 remembrance in this week’s news roundup.
DORA delay leaves EU banks fighting for their audit rights
The regulation requires firms to expand scrutiny of critical vendors that haven’t yet been identified.
Etrading wins UK bond tape, R3 debuts new lab, TNS buys Radianz, and more
The Waters Cooler: The Swiss release an LLM, overnight trading strays further from reach, and the private markets frenzy continues in this week’s news roundup.
Fintech powering LSEG’s AI Alerts dissolves
ModuleQ, a partner and investment of Refinitiv and then LSEG since 2018, was dissolved last week after it ran out of funding.
Halftime review: How top banks and asset managers are tackling projects beyond AI
Waters Wrap: Anthony highlights eight projects that aren’t centered around AI at some of the largest banks and asset managers.
Speakerbus goes bust, Broadridge buys Signal, banks mandate cyber training, and more
The Waters Cooler: The Federal Reserve is reserved on GenAI, FloQast partners with Deloitte Australia, UBS invests in Domino Data Lab, and more in this week’s roundup.