High-Frequency Trading special report
Click here to download the PDF
Is the Gain Worth the Pain?
If you had to point your finger at the single most controversial and emotive issue currently in the financial services industry, high-frequency trading (HFT) would be it. But that's understandable, thanks primarily to the May 6, 2010 Flash Crash, which overnight thrust the HFT industry-not just in the US, but globally-into the spotlight. And, as a result of a number of other "loss" incidents since then, HFT has, rightly or wrongly, been blamed for a bewildering array of the industry's woes, which, in turn, has drawn disproportionate scrutiny from global regulators. That, too, is understandable, given regulators' primary remits, regardless of their geographic location and jurisdictions: to ensure a fair, transparent and reliable marketplace for participants of all shapes and sizes to trade financial instruments.
It is therefore safe to assume we're going to see at least some level of regulation impinging on the HFT market, although quite when that regulation is going to be introduced, how invasive it might turn out to be, and what it will look like in its final form in terms of the specific practices it seeks to curtail, is anyone's guess.
In the Q&A section of this special report on page 10, respondents discuss the technology implications for firms looking to establish HFT environments by reducing latency throughout their networks; the extent to which HFT has permeated other asset classes over and above its equity stronghold; and the likelihood of invasive regulatory controls, which, while necessary to ensure an orderly marketplace, might affect the efficacy of HFT strategies to the point that firms might decide the gain simply isn't worth their pain. Granted, HFT is not for everyone-long-only asset managers are, for example, interested in anything but HFT. But if you consider that as much as 70 percent of all equity volume in the US market is executed in an HFT environment, losing market participants will have a marked impact across the global financial markets.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
An AI-first approach to model risk management
Firms must define their AI risk appetite before trying to manage or model it, says Christophe Rougeaux
Launch of Deutsche Börse’s midpoint dark pool delayed
The exchange group faces a roadblock as it awaits a reference price waiver from its regulator.
Tech VC funding: It’s not just about the money
The IMD Wrap: It’s been a busy year for tech and data companies seeking cash to kick-start new efforts. Max details how some are putting the fun into fundraising.
Bond tape hopefuls size up commercial risks as FCA finalizes tender
Consolidated tape bidders say the UK regulator is set to imminently publish crucial final details around technical specifications and data licensing arrangements for the finished infrastructure.
If M&A picks up, who’s on the auction block?
Waters Wrap: With projections that mergers and acquisitions are geared to pick back up in 2025, Anthony reads the tea leaves of 25 of this year’s deals to predict which vendors might be most valuable.
The Waters Cooler: A little crime never hurt nobody
Do you guys remember that 2006 Pitchfork review of Shine On by Jet?
Removal of Chevron spells t-r-o-u-b-l-e for the C-A-T
Citadel Securities and the American Securities Association are suing the SEC to limit the Consolidated Audit Trail, and their case may be aided by the removal of a key piece of the agency’s legislative power earlier this year.
After acquisitions, Exegy looks to consolidated offering for further gains
With Vela Trading Systems and Enyx now settled under one roof, the vendor’s strategy is to be a provider across the full trade lifecycle and flex its muscles in the world of FPGAs.
