Are FPGAs the Miracle Cure?

robdaly-headshot
Rob Daly, Sell-Side Technology

With the advent of the US Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC's) Rule 15c3-5 on pre-trade risk due to take effect in a matter of weeks, the industry seem to have settled on the use of low-latency field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) to make the necessary risk calculations.

However, we are only at the tip of the iceberg in adopting this architecture. It is not until any typical programmer can program these devices easily that one can say that the industry has accepted the technology, an industry contact told me recently.

In the meantime, the use of FPGAs will be a relatively expensive proposition in terms of purchasing, deploying and managing them from both a hardware and human perspective. Finding programmers well versed in the hardware description language (HDL) used by FPGAs and keeping them fat and happy in this competitive environment is going to strain the personnel budget.

There is light at the end of the tunnel. Vendors are working hard to either hide or eliminate the need to code in HDL.

Processor giant Intel is continuing to work on its Many Integrated Core (MIC) architecture that will integrate up to 32 cores on to a single die, according to vendor officials. The immediate benefit of the new architecture is that Intel multi-core and many-core platforms share the same programming model, letting C or C++ source code be compiled for either platform depending on which works best.

Microsoft researchers are also on the case with their Project Kiwi, which looks to model digital circuits with concurrent programs using a standard library in C# for multi-threaded programming among other things, according to vendor officials.

Then there are always the smaller vendors, such as British Columbia-based Secodix, that believe that they have built a better mousetrap. Secodix is betting that its eXtreme Processing Unit (XPU), which supports C++ programming on FPGA architecture, will have prospective clients knocking on its door.

Expect to see similar products to pop up in the months and year to come while the industry wrestles on a de facto standard.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.

If M&A picks up, who’s on the auction block?

Waters Wrap: With projections that mergers and acquisitions are geared to pick back up in 2025, Anthony reads the tea leaves of 25 of this year’s deals to predict which vendors might be most valuable.

Removal of Chevron spells t-r-o-u-b-l-e for the C-A-T

Citadel Securities and the American Securities Association are suing the SEC to limit the Consolidated Audit Trail, and their case may be aided by the removal of a key piece of the agency’s legislative power earlier this year.

Enough with the ‘Bloomberg Killers’ already

Waters Wrap: Anthony interviews LSEG’s Dean Berry about the Workspace platform, and provides his own thoughts on how that platform and the Terminal have been portrayed over the last few months.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a WatersTechnology account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here