Trust Me, I'm Not Cheating
![anthony-malakian-waters anthony-malakian-waters](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/216/142216/anthony-malakian-waters.jpg.webp?h=373a525f&itok=zNeqXFEa)
Where's the trust? Sometimes, risk management just comes down to a basic level of trust.
This past week I was in Chicago for Inside Market Data's annual Chicago-focused event. On Tuesday, a few days before UBS' Kweku Adoboli alleged mutiny that may cost the bank $2 billion came to light, I was speaking with Dr. Euan Sinclair, the risk manager of prop-trading shop Bluefin Trading.
I found what he told me to be very interesting: More important than any technological solution for risk management is the simple concept of trust. Specifically, the traders need to trust him; they need to know that he will have their best interests in mind. Sinclair gave me an example where despite having a robust infrastructure in place to monitor risk and detect violations, it's impossible for any trading firm's systems to be full proof.
The funny thing is that Sinclair was adamant-even though he's the risk manager-about providing an environment so that he doesn't stand in the way of his firm making money. He trusts his traders, so when they come to him to propose entering into a potentially risky position, he will likely green-light the strategy as long as it fits inside the firm's risk parameters. Not all bets will pay off and there will be loses, that doesn't mean that you run and hide or slap an ambitious trader down.
The only times when problems arise are when traders hide their true intentions from him.
This is always going to be an uphill battle for risk managers. If your systems are too invasive, if your risk management practices are too timid, it creates a tough environment to make money. That's what this business is all about-making money. In that kind of environment, fraud will happen. That's not to say that it will happen at every firm, or that it should be tolerated, but it will happen and that doesn't always mean that a firm failed its employees and investors by skimping on technology.
It's such a simple concept, but we all seem shocked every time a rogue trader comes to light. Be sure that these things happen on a far smaller scale ($2 billion?!) all the time, but because they happen at private companies they can be more easily swept under the rug and the losses can be contained. No one is immune-sometimes even if you have the most pristine IT in place.
The shame the fraud that has transpired at UBS is not the loss of money; it's the loss of jobs that may result in response to this crime if UBS scales back its investment banking operations.
This will be an ongoing war as the art of trading becomes more automated and conducted at speeds that are monitored in microseconds and eventually nanoseconds.
Technology can be a very valuable weapon in this war-both offensively and defensively-but the same way that software can't feel emotion, technology will always be at a disadvantage when it comes to monitoring broken trust.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
Dealer relief at delays to Refinitiv Matching’s tech migration
First phase of replatforming for Swiss spot pairs set to be pushed to mid-2025.
Kepler Cheuvreux builds proprietary execution platform with Adaptive
The broker wants to move away from third-party technologies as DORA’s risk management requirements could make vendor relationships more cumbersome.
Let’s grow the third-party risk playbook – CME security chief
The CrowdStrike outage has highlighted the need for the financial sector to adjust its game plan.
Facing platform shutdown, former IEX Cloud head buys its assets in 11th-hour bid
Tim Baker, Pedro Aguayo, and a silent partner have come together to purchase IEX Cloud’s assets days before the exchange was to retire all its products on August 31.
Recent volatility highlights tech’s vital role in fixed income pricing
MarketAxess’ Julien Alexandre discusses how cutting-edge technology is transforming pricing and execution in the fixed income market amid periodic bouts of volatility
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
Where have all the exchange platform providers gone?
The IMD Wrap: Running an exchange is a profitable business. The margins on market data sales alone can be staggering. And since every exchange needs a reliable and efficient exchange technology stack, Max asks why more vendors aren’t diving into this space.
This Week: Trading Technologies completes ANS deal; State Street; Equinix; and more
A summary of the latest financial technology news.