LEI Impact on Corp Actions May Have Been Over-Estimated, Claim Experts

hughstewart

Despite claims the upcoming legal entity identifier (LEI) may be able to involve issuers within corporate actions standardization debates, experts agree the LEI is expected to have very little impact, if any at all, on the corporate actions space.

While the LEI will ensure the corporate action is linked to the right entity,
challenges such as the increasing complexity of events and timeliness will remain untouched.

London-based Hugh Stewart, sales director at DClear Services, SmartStream Technologies, explains that the LEI, just like anything that can contribute to
the standardization of corporate actions, will have a positive impact in this space, but the value will remain limited in the short term.

“Every step of automation and standardization in corporate actions shaves costs, and while an LEI could be useful, if you have listings in more than one exchange, the impact will be limited in the grander scheme of event management costs,” says Stewart.

“All systems will not necessarily have all the right alphanumeric boxes to have the LEI as their sort index mechanism, and as a result, firms will still require translation tables,” he says.

However, an issuer may well have to stamp their corporate actions with the LEI, if they are part of a jurisdiction that requires this. Washington DC-based Mike Atkin, managing director at the EDM Council, says it all still depends on how the regulators implement the LEI, and what the reporting requirements will be.

“Regulators could mandate that every entity must use the LEI, meaning issuers would certainly use it when releasing their corporate actions. This could help improve quality, timeliness and processing efficiency, but these remain open issues the regulators have yet to show their stance on,” he explains.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.

Enough with the ‘Bloomberg Killers’ already

Waters Wrap: Anthony interviews LSEG’s Dean Berry about the Workspace platform, and provides his own thoughts on how that platform and the Terminal have been portrayed over the last few months.

Banks seemingly build more than buy, but why?

Waters Wrap: A new report states that banks are increasingly enticed by the idea of building systems in-house, versus being locked into a long-term vendor contract. Anthony explores the reason for this shift.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a WatersTechnology account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here