Show Me the Data!
More firms need to be granted access to the CAT.

In a few weeks, my older sister and her husband will be moving from their apartment into their first house, and while my sister was smart enough to hire movers, my parents and I will both trek up to Albany’s suburbs to help them move in.
Unlike the movers, my parents and I won’t require payment for our services. We’ll simply be doing it out of the kindness of our hearts. However, my sister and her husband will likely buy us dinner that night, and hopefully some cold, alcoholic beverages.
This is the social code most of us follow. One hand washes the other, so to speak. It’s not that I’m expecting dinner and beers—although I suppose it looks like I am—it’s more just nice to be appreciated for my hard work and doing a favor.
Judging by the way the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is handling the Consolidated Audit Trail (CAT), you’d be lucky to get a warm bottle of water if you helped them move into a new place.
No Data
With all that is required of reporting firms, it seems that the least the SEC and SROs could do is offer them access to the data.
As you'll see in my upcoming feature, there are still plenty of issues that need to be resolved around implementing the CAT. One topic I didn’t touch on in my feature was the possibility of reporting firms having access to the data they submit. As it stands now, only the SEC and self-regulatory organizations (SROs) will be able to view data reported to the CAT. And while the topic has been brought up multiple times over the years, the SEC and SROs have stood firm on their belief that not everyone should have access to the data.
Lest we forget, this is a project that the SEC estimates will cost the industry $2.4 billion initially and $1.7 billion annually. We’re not talking about a drop in the bucket. Serious time and money will be spent on getting systems updated to report to the CAT.
With all that is required of reporting firms, it seems that the least the SEC and SROs could do is offer them access to the data. Many in the industry see the benefits it would provide firms.
Surveil and Correct
Dave Emero, a vice president at Goldman Sachs involved in the regulatory operations space, says having access to CAT data would help firms with their surveillance processes and ensure their data is correct.
“If data ends up being corrected within the CAT, either by the CAT processor through its automated tools and techniques that are able to do corrections of data, or manually by firms, having access to that data in its correct state for comparison purposes and to our internal books and records would be able to provide transparency to those actions that occurred. Where that data was updated would be very important to be able to feed it back into solving the root causes that caused those mismatches in the first place or necessitated those error corrections,” said Emero, speaking on a panel at the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (Sifma) Ops conference last month.
“Ultimately, I think that the broker-dealer community having access to their data would certainly make things more efficient. The possibility of having feedback to ensure accuracy and better compliance rates are all good reasons why having access to our CAT data would be very helpful," Emero added.
David Shillman, associate director of the division of trading and markets at the SEC who spoke on the same panel, said expanding the CAT to other users is probably worth exploring, but that there is much to be done to simply get the CAT up and running. He added that there are security concerns that can come up from offering more firms access to CAT’s data.
Jess Haberman, Fidessa’s compliance director who represents the vendor on the CAT Development Advisory Group (DAG), says the SROs aren’t interested in doing anything that doesn’t benefit them.
“I understand the participants being reluctant to add anything else that’s not required,” Haberman says. “I think it should be explored at least with the plan processor. They may be able to do it, charge per use. … We hope that idea continues to be considered.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Emerging Technologies
BlueMatrix acquires FactSet’s RMS Partners platform
This is the third acquisition BlueMatrix has made this year.
Waters Wavelength Ep. 331: Cresting Wave’s Bill Murphy
Bill Murphy, Blackstone’s former CTO, joins to discuss that much-discussed MIT study on AI projects failing and factors executives should consider as the technology continues to evolves.
FactSet adds MarketAxess CP+ data, LSEG files dismissal, BNY’s new AI lab, and more
The Waters Cooler: Synthetic data for LLM training, Dora confusion, GenAI’s ‘blind spots,’ and our 9/11 remembrance in this week’s news roundup.
Chief investment officers persist with GenAI tools despite ‘blind spots’
Trading heads from JP Morgan, UBS, and M&G Investments explained why their firms were bullish on GenAI, even as “replicability and reproducibility” challenges persist.
Wall Street hesitates on synthetic data as AI push gathers steam
Deutsche Bank and JP Morgan have differing opinions on the use of synthetic data to train LLMs.
A Q&A with H2O’s tech chief on reducing GenAI noise
Timothée Consigny says the key to GenAI experimentation rests in leveraging the expertise of portfolio managers “to curate smaller and more relevant datasets.”
Etrading wins UK bond tape, R3 debuts new lab, TNS buys Radianz, and more
The Waters Cooler: The Swiss release an LLM, overnight trading strays further from reach, and the private markets frenzy continues in this week’s news roundup.
AI fails for many reasons but succeeds for few
Firms hoping to achieve ROI on their AI efforts must focus on data, partnerships, and scale—but a fundamental roadblock remains.