Max Bowie: From High Performance to High Octane

Marketing executives in the financial technology and market data industries love to use imagery of Formula One cars to promote their products. And it’s no surprise: the speed, the performance, the risk, the glitz and glamor. Both industries depend on operating at peak performance to create a winning strategy amid intense competition.
And being a huge F1 fan, I was thrilled to have NBC Sports F1 commentators Steve Matchett and Leigh Diffey as guest speakers and presenters of this year’s Inside Market Data and Inside Reference Data awards to describe the parallels to an audience of our readers.
While the speed of F1 cars is perhaps the most-overused cliché, it’s far from the only one. For example, just as trading firms must carefully monitor factors like value-at-risk and deposit margin with marketplaces, prospective F1 teams must pay millions of dollars to the sport’s governing body before they are allowed to compete, as a guarantee that they have the serious funding required to see them through a season in the sport. And like in finance, to do more than just compete—which will cost at least a $20 million endeavor for even the most penny-pinching team (several of which are reportedly in dire financial straits)—one needs to make continual upgrades and investment to maintain peak performance, which don’t come cheap. Gone are the days of “gentlemen racers” and privateer teams that would turn up for a few races and then depart, as in the 1960s and 1970s.
Another change from that era is safety: Back then, crowds were close to the track and separated from the asphalt only by hay bales; drivers and track marshals were routinely injured or worse. Now, tracks have been upgraded at a cost of billions with large run-off areas to protect spectators and slow an out-of-control car. A padded “collar” around the driver’s cockpit prevents drivers from being thrown from side to side like rag dolls in the event of a crash, while the HANS (Head and Neck Support) device that connects to the rear of drivers’ helmets prevents their heads from being thrown forwards and backwards under the g-force loads of cornering, accelerating, decelerating, and impact. The monocoque “cocoon” in which the driver sits must pass rigorous crash tests, and teams are experimenting with enclosed cockpit devices designed to prevent drivers from being hit by debris.
And in finance, authorities have made similar efforts to protect participants and investors—though like in F1, it usually takes an horrific event (like the pit lane fire that engulfed Jos Verstappen’s Benetton F1 car at Hockenheim in 1994, where Steve Matchett was rear jack operator) to spur protective measures. Both industries are ruled by uncompromising governing bodies that impose strict rules and seem to take pleasure in enforcing them. But whether you think of an F1 driver as the pilot of a wheeled missile or derivatives as “weapons of mass destruction,” you understand why so much regulation is important. And in a trading environment, speed of data and execution is important, though arguably brakes and a steering wheel are more important than top speed alone.
In finance, authorities have made similar efforts to protect participants and investors—though like in F1, it usually takes an horrific event to spur protective measures
Collecting and Processing
And last but certainly not least is the sheer volume of data that the F1 teams collect and process in real time: timing data, information from sensors on the cars, which the teams collect and send from whatever track they’re at around the world to the teams’ home bases (mostly in the UK) for analysis, the results of which are then sent back to the trackside to be incorporated into race strategy, or to warn the team and driver that a component might be near breaking point.
In fact, one shot inside a pit garage at the recent Spanish Grand Prix showed half a dozen or so members of one team intently watching banks of data monitors for some anomaly or opportunity. I couldn’t help think of a trading floor. And I couldn’t help think that there must be much that these industries can learn from one another. So perhaps our awards helped convert some more fans to F1, and perhaps it will inspire market data professionals to think about some of their challenges in a different way.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Emerging Technologies
Waters Wavelength Ep. 331: Cresting Wave’s Bill Murphy
Bill Murphy, Blackstone’s former CTO, joins to discuss that much-discussed MIT study on AI projects failing and factors executives should consider as the technology continues to evolves.
FactSet adds MarketAxess CP+ data, LSEG files dismissal, BNY’s new AI lab, and more
The Waters Cooler: Synthetic data for LLM training, Dora confusion, GenAI’s ‘blind spots,’ and our 9/11 remembrance in this week’s news roundup.
Chief investment officers persist with GenAI tools despite ‘blind spots’
Trading heads from JP Morgan, UBS, and M&G Investments explained why their firms were bullish on GenAI, even as “replicability and reproducibility” challenges persist.
Wall Street hesitates on synthetic data as AI push gathers steam
Deutsche Bank and JP Morgan have differing opinions on the use of synthetic data to train LLMs.
A Q&A with H2O’s tech chief on reducing GenAI noise
Timothée Consigny says the key to GenAI experimentation rests in leveraging the expertise of portfolio managers “to curate smaller and more relevant datasets.”
Etrading wins UK bond tape, R3 debuts new lab, TNS buys Radianz, and more
The Waters Cooler: The Swiss release an LLM, overnight trading strays further from reach, and the private markets frenzy continues in this week’s news roundup.
AI fails for many reasons but succeeds for few
Firms hoping to achieve ROI on their AI efforts must focus on data, partnerships, and scale—but a fundamental roadblock remains.
Waters Wavelength Ep. 330: AI hot takes
It’s Shen and Reb this week talking about AI and the landscape for fintech partnerships.