Max Bowie: Are You a Governator?

Perhaps more than ever, at this year’s European Financial Information Summit, hosted by Waters stablemates Inside Market Data and Inside Reference Data, data quality and governance was high on the agenda, not just in the reference data stream, but also among market data executives tasked with reducing costs and eliminating duplication within datasets.
In the past, these tasks fell to market and reference data managers, though more recently—and spurred by pioneers such as John Bottega and Peter Serenita—firms have appointed chief data officers with overall responsibility for data governance throughout their organizations. What’s the difference, you ask? In my understanding, a government governs, which means enforcing policy; while various arms of local government or agencies manage—by which I mean they manage the implementation of what the government dictates. So the concept of data governance first needs to come from the top—i.e. C-level executives and a company’s board—before its implementation can be managed by those in the trenches.
Slight Difference
However, these CDOs look at the position slightly differently: Being responsible for all data, they say, doesn’t mean they’re the only one who needs to worry about—or take responsibility for—data quality. Indeed, many see their role as an evangelist of processes and best practices to the rest of their firms, including their boards of directors.
In fact, some data management professionals dislike the CDO role because it makes firms think that appointing one person will miraculously solve their problems. “At a board level, responsibility has to reside with all of the leadership,” said Julian Dorado, director of data management at M&G Investments, adding that the practice of appointing one person to lead data governance mistakenly encourages other executives to neglect their data management duties, believing that the CDO will take care of it, whereas “it really needs to be across the organization.”
If there was one clear message repeated again and again throughout the event, it was that appointing a CDO does not solve the problem, but merely reflects the fact that a firm recognizes it has a problem and is taking the first step toward a solution. One person alone cannot solve a firm’s data quality issues; rather, the responsibility must lie with each and every employee who touches the data—creating a “data culture” and effectively making everyone a data scientist of sorts, said Capgemini’s Zhiwei Jiang, who gave a presentation at the event—while the ultimate responsibility must be shouldered by a company’s board, who should be prepared to be actively involved in (and concerned about) the accuracy of data that drives decisions they sign off on.
Responsibility for data quality must lie with each and every employee who touches the data, while the ultimate responsibility must be shouldered by a company’s board.
Questionable
Here’s the thing: Without good data governance processes, it’s harder to control your datasets and understand the quality of your data. If you can’t verify your data’s accuracy, you should assume it is questionable. And if your data is questionable, then so is everything ranging from trades and portfolio valuations to the profit-and-loss (P&L) figures by which management sets strategy—not to mention other important activities, such as client reporting and relationship management. Then, of course, there’s the data required to comply with new regulations and reporting mandates, which especially needs to be accurate.
“Let’s not underestimate the challenge of complying—but it’s difficult because of where we’re coming from, not because of what it is,” said Chris Bannocks, chief data management officer at ING Bank, who spoke on a panel at the conference.
With all this at stake, the question is not whether you can afford to make the investment in data governance projects, no matter how arduous and expensive, but whether you can afford not to. W
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Emerging Technologies
DeepSeek success spurs banks to consider do-it-yourself AI
Chinese LLM resets price tag for in-house systems—and could also nudge banks towards open-source models.
Standard Chartered goes from spectator to player in digital asset game
The bank’s digital assets custody offering is underpinned by an open API and modular infrastructure, allowing it to potentially add a secondary back-end system provider.
Saugata Saha pilots S&P’s way through data interoperability, AI
Saha, who was named president of S&P Global Market Intelligence last year, details how the company is looking at enterprise data and the success of its early investments in AI.
Data partnerships, outsourced trading, developer wins, Studio Ghibli, and more
The Waters Cooler: CME and Google Cloud reach second base, Visible Alpha settles in at S&P, and another overnight trading venue is approved in this week’s news round-up.
Are we really moving on from GenAI already?
Waters Wrap: Agentic AI is becoming an increasingly hot topic, but Anthony says that shouldn’t come at the expense of generative AI.
Cloud infrastructure’s role in agentic AI
The financial services industry’s AI-driven future will require even greater reliance on cloud. A well-architected framework is key, write IBM’s Gautam Kumar and Raja Basu.
Waters Wavelength Ep. 310: SigTech’s Bin Ren
This week, SigTech’s CEO Bin Ren joins Eliot to discuss GenAI’s progress since ChatGPT’s emergence in 2022, agentic AI, and challenges with regulating AI.
Microsoft exec: ‘Generative AI is completely passé. This is the year of agentic AI’
Microsoft’s Symon Garfield said that AI advancements are prompting financial services firms to change their approach to integrating AI-powered solutions.