December 2014: How Soft Are You?
![victor-anderson-portrait victor-anderson-portrait](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/912/271912/victor-anderson-portrait.jpg.webp?h=ec4f65b5&itok=iURTO8hM)
There was a story circulating in UK buy-side circles the best part of a decade ago about the CEO of a prominent and well-respected third-party technology provider who “lost it” when he learned that a prospective client had decided not to implement his firm’s product, instead opting for a rival’s offering. The story goes that the incensed CEO marched into the asset manager’s offices and confronted the firm’s CTO about his decision, in full view of other staff members, which was both embarrassing for the CTO and unprofessional on the part of the CEO. Apparently the CEO was “escorted” from the building by security, never to set foot on the premises again, tarnishing his reputation and that of his firm’s in the process.
It’s difficult establishing the veracity of this anecdote, given that I have yet to meet anyone who actually witnessed the incident first-hand, although I have met many in the industry familiar with the story, which suggests that there must at least be a grain of truth to it. I was reminded of that incident recently when chatting to an individual representing a technology firm that had entered this year’s Buy-Side Technology Awards about the outcome of one of the categories. He was indignant when he learned that his firm’s offering had not come out on top, given that “it has unquestionably the best technology, the most user-firms, and the most new contracts signed in the last year.”
Naturally, I wanted to test the validity of his claims, which I did by revisiting all of the entries in the category in question, only to find that not only were these claims spurious, but that a number of other entries had far better track records, not only over the past 12 months in terms of new clients signed, but also in terms of their total user-firm numbers. As for the assertion about possessing “the best technology,” that’s an area that’s not even worth investigating, given that anyone who knows the buy side—even superficially—would concede that there are no metrics that allow anyone to claim with any validity that one product has “better” technology than any other. All offerings have their attributes, which certain buy-side firms might find appealing given their technical, budgetary, and operational requirements, but there never is and nor will there be a product that satisfies every buy-side firm’s needs.
As I’ve written before, I’d go a step further and argue that possessing great technology really only means that you’re invited to the game, but it definitely doesn’t mean you’re going to win it. For that, you need soft skills, which, when considering the above example, is clearly not a prerequisite for all the technology providers in our industry.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Emerging Technologies
Waters Wrap: The changing definition and perception of blockchain
Anthony says that questions of definition and perception are helping kill DLT projects in the capital markets—oh, and a lack of proven implementations.
This Week: IPC extends Google Cloud partnership, BlackRock/AIA, DTCC and more
A summary of the latest financial technology news.
Waters Wavelength Podcast: Deutsche Bank’s Boon-Hiong Chan
Boon-Hiong Chan from Deutsche Bank joins the podcast to talk about blockchain interoperability.
SocGen pushes data, analytics use cases for SG Markets
The bank is letting a handful of clients experiment with its proprietary data and models to inform their research.
Ace high or busted flush? Digital Asset’s mixed fortunes mirror DLT adversity
The vendor hoped to remodel post-trade using blockchain technology—and it still might—but its bumpy progress raises questions over the future of DLT in finance.
AI could cut time for money laundering checks by 99%
Leading crypto exchange rolling out large language model for enhanced due diligence checks.
Standard Chartered keeps faith with quantum experimentation
The bank is aiming to future-proof itself with the ability to adopt new technology at an early stage.
Waters Wrap: CME, Google and the pursuit of ultra-low-latency trading
CME Group and Google have announced Aurora, Illinois, as the location for the exchange’s new co-location facility. Anthony explains why this is more than just the next phase of the two companies’ originally announced project.