Don't Cry For HFT, Argentina

It's the second time in 15 years that the South American country has defaulted on its government debt interest payments, though this time—and surely adding insult to its recent heartbreaking loss in the World Cup final—the causes are tied to the ruling of a US federal judge thousands of miles away and the insistence of a small group of hedge funds led by Elliott Management's NLM Capital unit, rather than prudential policy or macroeconomics.
When reading the details of the country's latest financial tumult, I was reminded of a conversation I recently had with a colleague who covers hedge funds at Risk, BST's sister magazine, during which we discussed distressed debt restructuring, such as that in question with Argentina.
Our conclusion was simple: sometimes, having a clever strategy isn't as important as having dogged legal representation.
Increasingly, it seems, the latter is actually the former.
The most amazing thing about this isn't the relatively tiny amount of money in question—only about $1.5 billion in bonds are in dispute, though the outcome of the legal questions surrounding them could put billions more into play.
It's not just the grievance that worries; it's the feeling that the entire process has been hijacked.
Instead, it's the way the situation could completely recast the rights of creditors, relative to those of the sovereign entities issuing the bonds. Some argue its consequences are already made obvious in the revised legal mechanisms tied to newly-issued debt.
Of course, more than a decade of legal uncertainty—to say nothing of the potential future pain for ordinary Argentinians—will do that. And worse of all: whether the default status lingers or not, all of this undermines what would otherwise have been a fairly elegant, exchange-based, and broadly-agreed solution to the original 2001 event. It's discouraging, to say the least.
Self-Made Messes
Then again, elegance doesn't always spell effectiveness when it comes to navigating a mess of one's own making, especially if the optimal outcome or new rule turns on the cooperation of market players that are incented to do otherwise.
Indeed, a second mess can often be born out of the solution to the first.
This quandary will ring familiar to anyone who has followed the years-long discussion over certain markets now trading at unfathomable speeds—a debate which, in a new phase, has now pulled in at least three major sell sides' internal dark pools for investigation. Why? Because their mis-marketing to clients is provable, and potentially illegal.
But much like NLM, the high-frequency trading firms, themselves, aren't in for that fate—even if both are becoming known in the popular imagination as 'vultures'.
In the vast majority of cases, HFT shops have done nothing wrong under current regulation, despite some of their trading practices being ethically debatable. With a few exceptions, their pockets aren't as deep as investment banks either, making them lesser targets for an investigation ending in settlement or punitive fines. (Though somehow this doesn't stop them from influencing regulators and lawmakers).
The sound and fury in each situation is about more than the perceived predation involved; it's also about getting the fix done right—or rather the inability to do so because of a handful of actors' legal high-ground, a dash of remarkable obstinance, and in Argentina's case, a flimsy Latin "parri pasu" clause that was very unusually interpreted by an activist judge.
It's not just the grievance that worries; it's the feeling that the entire process has been hijacked.
And while the HFT debate shouldn't require a decade to resolve itself, the potential for missteps and knock-on effects—as with the Argentine debt—are myriad, and equally problematic if not handled right.
I'm not sure one will find Latin in the middle of any legal decision or enforcement on an HFT matter, but given the trading style's technicality, it might as well as be. Let's just hope, and make sure, that a massive precedent for HFT doesn't hinge on a legal nuance so broadly interpretable.
Because we know this much: the stubborness isn't going away.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Emerging Technologies
DeepSeek success spurs banks to consider do-it-yourself AI
Chinese LLM resets price tag for in-house systems—and could also nudge banks towards open-source models.
Standard Chartered goes from spectator to player in digital asset game
The bank’s digital assets custody offering is underpinned by an open API and modular infrastructure, allowing it to potentially add a secondary back-end system provider.
Saugata Saha pilots S&P’s way through data interoperability, AI
Saha, who was named president of S&P Global Market Intelligence last year, details how the company is looking at enterprise data and the success of its early investments in AI.
Data partnerships, outsourced trading, developer wins, Studio Ghibli, and more
The Waters Cooler: CME and Google Cloud reach second base, Visible Alpha settles in at S&P, and another overnight trading venue is approved in this week’s news round-up.
Are we really moving on from GenAI already?
Waters Wrap: Agentic AI is becoming an increasingly hot topic, but Anthony says that shouldn’t come at the expense of generative AI.
Cloud infrastructure’s role in agentic AI
The financial services industry’s AI-driven future will require even greater reliance on cloud. A well-architected framework is key, write IBM’s Gautam Kumar and Raja Basu.
Waters Wavelength Ep. 310: SigTech’s Bin Ren
This week, SigTech’s CEO Bin Ren joins Eliot to discuss GenAI’s progress since ChatGPT’s emergence in 2022, agentic AI, and challenges with regulating AI.
Microsoft exec: ‘Generative AI is completely passé. This is the year of agentic AI’
Microsoft’s Symon Garfield said that AI advancements are prompting financial services firms to change their approach to integrating AI-powered solutions.