Parsing Fintech's Whimsical Name Game
![bourgaize-murray bourgaize-murray](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/106/287106/bourgaize-murray-580x358.png.webp?itok=DXKup3gH)
While writing up a piece examining intellectual property earlier this week, I plumbed the depths of my memory for the name of a low-latency provider that was involved in messy litigation in Australia—unsurprisingly, I came up empty.
I knew it was an odd name; I knew it started with a 'z.' But until our Inside Market Data editor Max Bowie—who has an elephant's knack for recollection—finally infomed me it was Zeptonics, I was completely helpless. The lawsuit stuck; the name, despite its unusualness, did not.
All of this toiling reminded me of a presentation I attended recently for New York's Fintech Innovation Lab, as well. Six startups from this year's cohort were featured, and almost all of them had snazzy-sounding, and even peculiar-looking, names.
Be it a randomly-capitalized letter in the middle, or a few vowels missing entirely, or a portmanteau—yesterday's news about Imatchative's new AltX platform is my recent favorite—it would appear not only common but, indeed, obligatory for a new company in our space to feature this kind of creative eponymy from the start.
Risk and Reward?
So, what's really in a name? Besides creating fodder for newsroom conversation, does this strategy actually work?
Well, especially in a saturated market segment—there's a reason market data vendors have the most outlandish names—having an identity that stands out shows a willingness to take a risk. It could even get potential clients to think or to laugh—and therefore, a couple days later, to remember.
As these small shops grow, or even get bought, I've been fascinated by how passionately their founders stick with the name, or lament when it's rubbished in favor of more dry or aligned branding by new ownership. It goes from a gimmick to a point of pride.
Then again, when an institutional investor is performing due diligence on a buy side and the question of their service providers comes up, explaining what "that startup with a funny name" actually does is a more serious matter. If not properly explained, it might even be a dealbreaker. Keeping in mind that many of these buy-side firms—hedge funds, especially—are named after some predicable combination of trees, mountaintops, castles, and Grecian warriors.
This could all be a question of context. After all, SunGard and Misys are normal-sounding names to those of us in the industry because they've been around seemingly forever—and more importantly, because they're massively successful. Whether Markit or Tradeweb or—gasp—International Business Machines (how snooze-worthy!), the products and client service, and eventually the expansion strategy and acquisitions, ultimately speak for the name, rather than the other way around. And the idea that such branding simplicity can't work in the current era is ridiculous, too. Just ask plain-jane Amazon Web Services (AWS), or baby Prince George ... well, once he can speak, anyway.
Eccentrics Welcome
But of course, not all of us are born into royalty; nor are all great services born only of companies of IBM or Amazon's scale and pedigree. And it's refreshing to constantly run across small providers with a different take on things, that really believe they can make it, and believe they know how to, as well.
Just what to call the next great new company would seem a fundamental, but astonishingly important part of that process.
Compared to other matters, though, perhaps it's actually neither.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Emerging Technologies
DORA will change the buy vs. build debate… maybe
Waters Wrap: With DORA’s deadline looming, trading firms are having to reassess their long-term tech strategies. Anthony wonders if that means more building and less buying.
JSE rolls out exchange data to cloud Marketplace, built with DataBP
The move—part of a broader cloud migration at the exchange—allows financial firms to connect and subscribe to JSE news, market data, and analytics via the cloud.
The SEC needs a hand with artificial intelligence
The SEC wants to take a tough stance on AI, but it has a talent problem… or a marketing problem. Or both…
This Week: Appital adds to book-building tool; SmartStream; TS Imagine and more
A summary of the latest financial technology news.
This Week: Startup Skyfire launches payment network for AI agents; State Street; SteelEye and more
A summary of the latest financial technology news.
Waters Wavelength Podcast: Standard Chartered’s Brian O’Neill
Brian O’Neill from Standard Chartered joins the podcast to discuss cloud strategy, costs, and resiliency.
SS&C builds data mesh to unite acquired platforms
The vendor is using GenAI and APIs as part of the ongoing project.
Chevron’s absence leaves questions for elusive AI regulation in US
The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron deference presents unique considerations for potential AI rules.