Questions Surround Bitcoin on the Buy Side
One of my colleagues, Timothy Bourgaize Murray, has a tendency to prattle on about things that I know nothing about. I'm not quite sure if this is more a sign of his intelligence, his pretentiousness, or maybe I'm not as erudite as I might think I am.
So when he wrote a New Perspective for BST on some Bitcoin developments ealier this week, I believe that I might've made a snarky comment before even reading his story, because that's the kind of editor I am.
And then I read his article. What jumped out at me were the prestigious buy-side names that are involved in the Bitcoin revolution.
Tim spoke with Bitcoin market maker, Fort Hill, a Massachusetts-based alternatives manager overseeing a family of different mutual funds totalling about $4 billion. Fort Hill founder Alec Petro believes in the potential of Bitcoin. "It's risky," he told Tim, "but we believe the risk-reward has been—and continues to be—attractive, and in the long term has the potential to have huge rewards to larger participants as the market evolves."
The story notes that there are two types of market participants: "market-makers accumulating trading positions throughout the day on one hand, and investors like Fortress Investment Group, who were in early consultations with [alternative trading system] Atlas, on the other." The ATS recently added Bitcoin trading and walleting to its offering, partnering with mainstay connectivity provider Perseus in the process.
In addition to Fortress and Fort Hill, prop trading shops Sun Trading and Tradebot Systems have also have begun dabbling in Bitcoin, according to Shawn Sloves, CEO of Atlas.
I'm an old man and I don't like change; the concept around Bitcoin remains out of my grasp. All I really know of it is what I read about it after the collapse of Bitcoin exchange Mt. Gox, the Silk Road debacle, and the apparent suicide of Autumn Radtke, the CEO of First Meta, an American Bitcoin exchange. For a virtual currency in its infancy, these aren't the most confidence-inspiring headlines. And yet, as Petro suggested, its price is starting to stabilize after a year of heady gains and runs on the currency. Some predict it to rise higher still; others see a bubble. That, of course, makes a market.
Rest assured, I will not be an expert on Bitcoin in the near future; I'll continue to get my cues from Tim. But there is some clear interest coming from the buy side as it relates to the potential of Bitcoin.
There's a lot of hype and negativity out there, and when there's a great deal of ignorance that encompasses a topic, sensational headlines will always rule the day. Perhaps sounds technology—and clarity of regulatory oversight—can make Bitcoin more capital markets-friendly. The question becomes: Will the negative headlines, or the positive hype, win the war?
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Emerging Technologies
The Waters Cooler: Big Tech, big fines, big tunes
Amazon stumbles on genAI, Google gets fined more money than ever, and Eliot weighs in on the best James Bond film debate.
AI set to overhaul market data landscape by 2029, new study finds
A new report by Burton-Taylor says the intersection of advanced AI and market data has big implications for analytics, delivery, licensing, and more.
New Bloomberg study finds demand for election-related alt data
In a survey conducted with Coalition Greenwich, the data giant revealed a strong desire among asset managers, economists and analysts for more alternative data from the burgeoning prediction markets.
How ‘Bond gadgets’ make tackling data easier for regulators and traders
The IMD Wrap: Everyone loves the hype around AI, especially financial firms. And now, even regulators are getting in on the act. But first... “The name’s Bond; J-AI-mes Bond”
Waters Cooler: AI tells it like it is… or does it?
A weekly round-up of stories from us and beyond. Plus, fun Scottish facts.
Google teams up with Linklaters on GenAI contract analysis project
While the large language model is unique to Linklaters and legal documents, Google believes financial services firms will also benefit from GenAI when it comes to contract analysis.
Man Group’s head of risk engineering doesn’t trust ChatGPT for managing risk
Risk managers have a duty to know how AI is being used within their firms. At a recent event, execs from Man Group and others discussed the benefits and pitfalls of AI in risk management.
Banks seemingly build more than buy, but why?
Waters Wrap: A new report states that banks are increasingly enticed by the idea of building systems in-house, versus being locked into a long-term vendor contract. Anthony explores the reason for this shift.