December 2013: Mounting Accountability

In many respects, it and reliability are inextricably linked, and are therefore often considered to be one and the same thing, although the former goes one step further than the latter by specifying who specifically is required to be reliable and what exactly it is they are responsible for. It allows people and organizations to plan ahead, understanding the protocols and parameters of their domains, and that their bases are covered and their contingencies planned.
Accountability plays a crucial role is firms' data governance frameworks, a phenomenon that is currently sweeping both sides of the industry on both sides of the Atlantic. And for good reason: Empirical and anecdotal evidence suggests that data management practices within significant numbers of financial services firms can best be described as laissez faire, with disparate, siloed business units developing their own data management strategies as they evolve, in a chaotic, reactive manner. And then there are the individuals within those autonomous business entities, who, first and foremost, manage their data in the best interests of their particular fiefdoms, in a manner consistent with pulling apart when exactly the opposite is required to drive firm-wide efficient and effective data management practices.
No Secret
It is no secret that an enormous amount of value resides deep within firms' data stores, which, now that the technology is readily available, can be mined and unlocked to the benefit of almost any business-related activity, ranging from client-facing functions such as customer relationship management (CRM), to activities more directly associated with furthering the performance of the business: advanced trading functionality and risk management disciplines.
It is, therefore, in every firm's interest to develop an operational and organizational framework underpinned by deliberate, logical, coherent, consistent, transparent and disciplined data management practices. Which inevitably brings us back to accountability, requiring individuals charged with managing certain aspects of the firm's overall data governance strategy to get on with the job at hand.
Accountability also means that if individuals will not or cannot fulfil their responsibilities for whatever reason, it provides the firm with a mandate to appoint someone who can. From the CIO's perspective, the notion of accountability, as it pertains to data governance, is simple: Do what you're paid to do, to the agreed levels of service and timeframe. And if you can't, find someone who can.
Empirical and anecdotal evidence suggests that data management practices within significant numbers of financial services firms can best be described as laissez faire, with disparate, siloed business units developing their own data management strategies as they evolve, in a chaotic, reactive manner.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Emerging Technologies
Academic warns of systemic risk from AI-powered trading
Strategies generated by LLMs exhibit “very strange, correlated trading behavior”, says Lopez Lira.
Anthropic partners with S&P, TT to build AI hub, Talos acquires Coin Metrics, and more
The Waters Cooler: Bloomberg adopts agentic AI, DSB report homes in on fairer data costs, and asset managers are coming for your utilities in this week’s news roundup.
The Model Context Protocol brings agents to life—along with risk
Waters Wrap: From chat to infrastructure modernization, Anthropic’s MCP offers a ‘bridge’ to agentic AI, but its early days may prove disillusioning.
BofA ramps up AI deployment, patents
The bank has 1,400 patents in AI and machine learning, either granted or pending, alongside a growing portfolio of 250 models.
BNY CEO updates on ‘platform’ operating model, AI rollout
In its Q2 earnings call, the bank outlined its progress on rolling out its new operating model and ‘Eliza’ internal AI assistant.
NZX outlines plans to bolster fast-growing dark pool
Since launching one year ago, NZX’s dark book has 5.5% of the exchange’s total turnover, and price improvement per trade on average is 11 basis points, but the exchange has more in store.
Waters Wavelength Ep. 325: Octaura’s Brian Bejile
The CEO joins the podcast to talk about the vendor’s modernization efforts in credit and CLOs.
Agentic AI comes to Bloomberg Terminal via Anthropic protocol
The data giant’s ubiquitous terminal has been slowly opening up for years, but its latest enhancement represents a forward leap in what CTO Shawn Edwards calls, “the way we should talk to the world.”