The Art of Cutting Corners
![anthony-malakian-waters anthony-malakian-waters](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/216/142216/anthony-malakian-waters.jpg.webp?h=373a525f&itok=zNeqXFEa)
I enjoy brewing my own beer. I make small batches in my kitchen that produce a gallon each. Because I already have most of the necessary cookware, all I need to buy are the ingredients, which amount to about $25 dollars per batch.
Sometimes if I’m brewing something intricate, I’ll put in the extra effort and do everything by the book, but that becomes far more time-consuming. But more often, I just throw everything into a nylon sack and cook up the mash. Bada-bing, bada-boom—all done.
Usually the result is excellent. Sometimes it’s good enough. Every so often, it’s terrible. But even if it’s bad, it’s only a gallon, which ends up being less than a 12-pack, so it’s no big deal throwing it out and starting over.
So what does this have to do with financial technology? Glad you asked.
This week, buy-side vendor SimCorp put out a survey where 82 percent of 135 respondents said that they have to create workarounds in the middle and back office to support their derivatives business. They choose this route, rather than consolidating into one system with all of their asset classes under one environment, which would make it easier to model and launch new products, and it would make it more efficient for client reporting.
They feel that even if it goes awry, they’ll only have to throw out a gallon of beer. No big deal.
Workarounds are attempted shortcuts to save on having to put in the time and cost of implementing a new platform that can bring together all these assets under one roof. Now, I think that everyone would agree that having one, true platform is best, but clearly—as this survey would attest to—using different platforms for different assets is just easier, even if not better.
So in this convoluted analogy, my beer making supplies—the jug, thermometer, nylon sack and pots and pans—are the “infrastructure”. The ingredients are the “models” that will help to create a new beer or, in this case, a new “derivatives product”. My cutting corners and just throwing everything together is the “workaround”.
Unlike at hedge funds, my workarounds don’t really help me save money and they don’t add time to the project—actually it’s just the opposite, as it can cost less and it is a lot quicker to make. But I do it mainly because the undertaking that is involved in doing everything by-the-book is significantly heftier.
Now, back to the survey: Eighty-two percent of these respondents are choosing to employ workarounds; 57 percent said that it takes them two or more months to model and launch a new product, when a couple of weeks would be ideal; and 34 percent admitted that because of their workarounds, client reports were compromised. (And that number is likely higher, as some respondents were likely a bit wary of being honest, even on a blind survey.)
What does that tell us? They are a bit concerned about their workarounds and they know that things can go wrong, but they still employ these workarounds because it’s easier and they are willing to take the risk that things will turn out okay. They feel that even if it goes awry, they’ll only have to throw out a gallon of beer. No big deal.
To be sure, the same can be said of firms that use Excel spreadsheets to manage client data rather than investing in an automated system. There’s a reason why firms do this, even if it’s risky. To be honest, I can’t say they’re entirely wrong. Yes, improper risk and data processes and controls have felled many a hedge fund or asset manager, buy sides aren’t collapsing every week because of this, either. They understand that as technology is concerned, just as in their investments, this is a risk/reward industry.
It may not be politically correct to say, and you can be sure that no hedge fund manager would ever admit to this on-the-record, but sometimes workarounds are better—as long as you don’t ever produce a skunked batch that gives everyone food poisoning.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Emerging Technologies
This Week: IPC extends Google Cloud partnership, BlackRock/AIA, DTCC and more
A summary of the latest financial technology news.
Waters Wavelength Podcast: Deutsche Bank’s Boon-Hiong Chan
Boon-Hiong Chan from Deutsche Bank joins the podcast to talk about blockchain interoperability.
SocGen pushes data, analytics use cases for SG Markets
The bank is letting a handful of clients experiment with its proprietary data and models to inform their research.
Ace high or busted flush? Digital Asset’s mixed fortunes mirror DLT adversity
The vendor hoped to remodel post-trade using blockchain technology—and it still might—but its bumpy progress raises questions over the future of DLT in finance.
AI could cut time for money laundering checks by 99%
Leading crypto exchange rolling out large language model for enhanced due diligence checks.
Standard Chartered keeps faith with quantum experimentation
The bank is aiming to future-proof itself with the ability to adopt new technology at an early stage.
Waters Wrap: CME, Google and the pursuit of ultra-low-latency trading
CME Group and Google have announced Aurora, Illinois, as the location for the exchange’s new co-location facility. Anthony explains why this is more than just the next phase of the two companies’ originally announced project.
This Week: Genesis/Interop.io; S&P Global; Finos/OS-Climate and more
A summary of the latest financial technology news.