Burning Issues: Could an Instant Message Be Worth a Thousand Bloomberg Terminals?

"One of the most exciting changes in market data for many years." No, I'm not talking about the fact that my esteemed editor Max Bowie has left me in charge of Inside Market Data for a fortnight as he takes a well-deserved vacation. Rather, this is one of the more colorful ways Markit's Open Federated Chat initiative was described to me this week.
If you haven't heard of it yet, Open Federated Chat is a new open messaging network that will allow financial professionals to communicate with one another regardless of their communication platform. It means that a trader using Microsoft Lync in sell-side firm A can chat to a customer using AOL Instant Messenger in buy-side firm B or indeed anyone else, sell-side, buy-side or vendor, provided their chat system is supported by Markit and they are a federated member of the network.
This week Morgan Stanley joined Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank as an official federated member - which essentially means the bank will hand over its entire contact directory to Markit and will be able to sponsor its buy-side clients to become federated members too. Other rumored partners include Citgroup, UBS, Credit Suisse, JP Morgan, Bank of America and Barclays; noticeably, six of the nine are founding banks of trade reporting platform Markit BOAT.
Though Markit does not refer openly to Bloomberg's Instant Messenger in its Open Federated Chat documentation - rather the vendor alludes to "closed established technology platforms and restrictive business models" - there is a general expectation (dare I say hope) in the industry that this initiative could displace Bloomberg's Instant messenger as the dominant communication tool used in financial services. Currently Bloomberg's messaging network is used by 315,000 financial and business professionals compared to the 190,000 that use Thomson Reuters' Eikon Messenger, but unlike Eikon Messenger, users have to have a Bloomberg terminal to join the conversation.
For firms who leverage Bloomberg's terminal for content as well as Bloomberg Instant, the $20,000 a year Bloomberg Professional subscription fee may be defensible, but after years of cost cutting and budget squeezing, the portion of terminal subscribers who only use the chat component are now struggling to justify the cost.
These users, typically on the sell side, are the ones funding the project; Fees seem to vary from firm to firm, but from the conversations I've had with the buy and sell side this week, Markit's official partners are paying around several hundred thousand dollars to become federated members. As an example, a firm paying $500,000 to become a member, only has to remove 24 Bloomberg terminals at $1750 per month to get a return on investment, which seems quite reasonable for a Goldman Sachs or Morgan Stanley.
So where does all this leave Bloomberg? Well frankly, between a rock and hard place. If the project succeeds - and a lot of money has already been invested to ensure it will- the vendor could be set to hemorrhage a large number of subscribers until only the hard core users are left. And even if Bloomberg were to join the party and make its messaging system more open, it's hard to see how it would be in a better position. Bloomberg declines to comment.
In fact, for a project whose raison d'être is to open up communication in the industry, most people are remaining frustratingly tight-lipped on the topic. Perhaps it's because the initiative is still its infancy; or perhaps because it's not good form to talk publically about vendor displacement projects. Either way, I try not to take it personally. Instead I look forward to a time in the future when all those involved and even Bloomberg might be ready to chat.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Emerging Technologies
DeepSeek success spurs banks to consider do-it-yourself AI
Chinese LLM resets price tag for in-house systems—and could also nudge banks towards open-source models.
Standard Chartered goes from spectator to player in digital asset game
The bank’s digital assets custody offering is underpinned by an open API and modular infrastructure, allowing it to potentially add a secondary back-end system provider.
Saugata Saha pilots S&P’s way through data interoperability, AI
Saha, who was named president of S&P Global Market Intelligence last year, details how the company is looking at enterprise data and the success of its early investments in AI.
Data partnerships, outsourced trading, developer wins, Studio Ghibli, and more
The Waters Cooler: CME and Google Cloud reach second base, Visible Alpha settles in at S&P, and another overnight trading venue is approved in this week’s news round-up.
Are we really moving on from GenAI already?
Waters Wrap: Agentic AI is becoming an increasingly hot topic, but Anthony says that shouldn’t come at the expense of generative AI.
Cloud infrastructure’s role in agentic AI
The financial services industry’s AI-driven future will require even greater reliance on cloud. A well-architected framework is key, write IBM’s Gautam Kumar and Raja Basu.
Waters Wavelength Ep. 310: SigTech’s Bin Ren
This week, SigTech’s CEO Bin Ren joins Eliot to discuss GenAI’s progress since ChatGPT’s emergence in 2022, agentic AI, and challenges with regulating AI.
Microsoft exec: ‘Generative AI is completely passé. This is the year of agentic AI’
Microsoft’s Symon Garfield said that AI advancements are prompting financial services firms to change their approach to integrating AI-powered solutions.