February 2013: All the Gear But No Idea
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7d48/a7d4833bc98f4f68d6cf892e70c0c79067edaa37" alt="victor-anderson-bst-awards-2011 victor-anderson-bst-awards-2011"
I remember, as I’m sure many of you do, that sinking feeling immediately following the realization that I simply couldn’t justify postponing any longer the addition of a new peripheral—a mouse, keyboard or printer—to my PC, a task that most often required only a modicum of computer knowledge, but the patience of a saint. In the late 1990s, installing a new mouse, an ostensibly straightforward task, typically took half-an-hour and entailed loading numerous device drivers ingeniously stored on separate 5.25-inch floppy discs. Could a more undemanding task be made to be any more convoluted, I wonder?
Thanks, by the way, to the Digital Equipment Corp. (DEC), IBM, Intel, Microsoft, NEC and Nortel consortium for dreaming up the Universal Serial Bus (USB) in the mid-1990s, a development that helped consign floppy discs to the computing scrapheap, while at the same time ushering in a new era of data storage and connectivity that has helped me maintain my blood pressure at a respectable 120/80.
Whenever I have the opportunity to speak with a technology end-user—someone on the front lines like a trader, head of desk, or portfolio manager, rather than the head of IT or the CIO—one of the first questions I ask is what single change they would make that would have the biggest impact on their daily lives. The answer, invariably, has nothing to do with increased levels of functionality or performance, but rather improved usability. In other words, users would prefer their technology to be more intuitive and easier to live with than faster or more functionally rich.
Where the software industry serving the capital markets has erred in the past is that often applications are designed with engineers’—and not end-users’—preferences in mind. Sure, projects are conceived and specced around feedback provided by the target market, but far too often the look and the feel of the user interface, the most critical piece of any application, is determined by what engineers think users want and not necessarily what they need.
Tim Murray's feature this month sheds light on this subject, and reports that a number of large third-party providers are focusing on this aspect of their products, now that the functional nuts and bolts within the applications have been worked out. According to Fahd Arshad, Bloomberg’s head of user experience (UX), one of his university professors would often tell his students that “the user isn’t me,” insinuating that what might seem logical and practical to an engineer or designer, wouldn’t necessarily be the case for end-users. That’s a great observation, one that if more technology providers focus on, might just initiate a reduction in the consumption of Beta-blockers in our industry.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Emerging Technologies
For AI’s magic hammer, every problem becomes a nail
A survey by Risk.net finds that banks are embracing a twin-track approach to AI in the front office: productivity tools today; transformation tomorrow.
On GenAI, Citi moves from firm-wide ban to internal roll-out
The bank adopted three specific inward-facing use cases with a unified framework behind them.
How a Chinese AI firm shook the tech world
DeepSeek’s AI model is the very ethos of doing what you can with what you have.
To unlock $40T private markets, Hamilton Lane embraced automation
In search of greater transparency and higher quality data, asset managers are taking a tech-first approach to resource gathering in an area that has major data problems.
Waters Wavelength Ep. 304: Nice Actimize’s Lee Garf
Lee joins to discuss changes in communication platforms over the last few years.
DTCC revamps data distribution, collection efforts with cloud, AI
The US clearinghouse is evaluating the possibilities that cloud and AI offer to streamline the processes by which it collects and makes data available to market participants.
Agentic AI and big questions for the technologists
Waters Wrap: Much the same way that GenAI dominated tech discussions over the last two years, the road ahead will feature a lot of agentic AI talk—and CIOs and CTOs better be prepared.
Waters Wavelength Ep. 302: Connectifi’s Nick Kolba
Nick joins the show to give his views on trends in the interoperability space and the FDC3 standard.