When is a Data Utility Not Really a Data Utility?
![nicholas-hamilton nicholas-hamilton](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/766/194766/nicholas-hamilton-580x358.jpg.webp?itok=j8oxjOCp)
As more vendors announce their plans to overhaul traditional approaches to data management, the terms ‘utility' and ‘managed service' are increasingly being used interchangeably. However, there is a distinction between the two.
A utility is a multi-tenant environment in which data is aggregated and cleansed once, and the same golden copy is then provided to multiple users. This model is attractive because it is more efficient and therefore cheaper than the common scenario, in which a vendor does the same data management work separately for each of its clients— who, in fact, all have the same requirements.
Like a utility, a managed service has a central, shared platform and operations team, which help to create economies of scale. However, the difference is that the data produced by a utility is completely standardized—exactly the same for all consumers— whereas a managed service produces a bespoke golden copy, tailored to the needs of individual users.
As discussions about utilities progress, it is becoming clear they face a number of obstacles. Utilities are well suited to the management of public-domain data, which they can redistribute freely, but they face a much harder time when dealing with data that is subject to a license.
Some data vendors are happy for the operators of utilities to take their data, manage it and redistribute it to the users of the utility. But the data vendors will, of course, require the users of the utility to pay them for the data they receive. As a result, the utilities have to install metering systems and controls.
Some observers believe that to really qualify as a utility, its operators must source the data themselves, so that it is not subject to redistribution licenses—a requirement that certainly raises the bar for all would-be data utilities.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
US banks seek to open vendors’ black box on green data
Inaugural Fed climate scenario analysis flags lack of transparency around third-party models.
IEX Cloud closure forces fintech clients to seek data alternatives
IEX says it is ditching its unprofitable data arm to focus on its core exchange business, but other vendors believe they can turn a profit from its former client base of fintechs, retail investors and some institutions.
The IMD Wrap: Déjà vu as exchange data industry weighs its options
Max highlights some of WatersTechnology’s recent reporting on data costs and capacity issues facing the options industry, and asks, haven’t we seen this before somewhere?
FRTB data quality issues persist amid shifting implementation dates
Banks are finding market and reference data challenges posed by the FRTB’s standardized model tricky, compounded by uncertainty over when the regulation will take effect.
Cboe pushes rule change to make way for proprietary Opra alternatives
As US options data has grown in volume and cost, Cboe says changing the public feed's governing document would make way for more competition from private alternatives, including its Cboe One Options Feed, launched in 2023.
Waters Wrap: What’s going on ‘Here’? Examining interop’s next move
OpenFin is now known as Here. Anthony explains what the rebrand might signal for the application interoperability space.
This Week: MSCI, Tradeweb, FactSet, LTX, MarketAxess, TS Imagine, and more
A summary of the latest financial technology news.
Regulators urged to promote cyber security investment
Public interest in stopping cyber attacks that could trigger bank runs, says Bundesbank researcher
Most read
- Zeros and ones: Industry contemplates T+0 as the next step
- IEX Cloud closure forces fintech clients to seek data alternatives
- Natixis refines in-house interoperability model