IBOR I/O
![michael-shashoua-waters michael-shashoua-waters](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/317/167317/michael-shashoua-waters.JPG.webp?h=acfe3244&itok=ceJMABf4)
An interesting wrinkle that emerged during Waters' recent breakfast discussion of the Investment Book of Record (IBOR) method of data management that appears to be taking hold in the industry, was whether firms should place responsibility for IBOR implementation in the front, middle or back office.
With IBOR's reference data nature, one would think it most likely would be a back-office responsibility. One might also guess that given the nature of front-office IT resources, or lack thereof, that IBOR might be a tall order for front offices. As Sylvain Pendaries, vice-president of front office and analytics at the Public Sector Pension Investment Board (PSP), a $76 billion Canadian fund, who recently remade IBOR at the fund, told attendees, PSP only has two developers on its front-office team. Most of the front-office is analysts, quants and portfolio managers.
As a result, for PSP and similarly structured front offices, they must either draw on IT resources elsewhere in their firm, or outsource. Pendaries believes that the prerequisite for deciding whether to buy or build for an IBOR is clarity about roles and responsibilities in the firm throughout the trade life cycle. "Once you know you have no liabilities, then you can look for outsourcing solutions," he said. "But don't do that unless you know the vulnerabilities in your organization."
A firm's front office may already be satisfied with the systems it has, as Eagle Investment Systems' Mal Cullen pointed out. An IBOR project can require implementation of multiple systems in succession, or leveraging of systems investments over time. As Bob Leaper of DST said, such projects stand a better chance of gaining traction if they are divided into shorter-term phases of three to six months each, with concrete results shown after each stage.
Another inherent challenge with an IBOR is the need for data warehousing to accommodate the large amounts of data necessary to maintain such a resource. The real-time nature of front-office needs means systems must be capable of delivering intra-day updates to and from the IBOR, keeping up with transactions that are happening.
Practically, IBOR is going to have to be operated and managed by the back office. That part of a firm is best suited to run IBOR because it has more time and expertise. That does not absolve front offices of responsibility, however. They must be sure they have a handle on IBOR output and work with their back-office colleagues to keep IBOR input and output flowing.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
Insurers deny cyber premiums are rising
Contrary to banks’ complaints, underwriters and brokers claim current market for policies is soft.
Cutting through the hype surrounding the FDTA rulemaking process
A bill requiring US regulators and institutions to adopt a machine-readable data framework for reporting purposes applies to entity identifiers, but not security identifiers, in a crucial difference, writes Scott Preiss, SVP and global head of Cusip Global Services.
The IMD Wrap: Quality drivers—the sticks and carrots accelerating the data quality race
Like a Formula One Grand Prix, data management is a race that can be won or lost. And just as each race is part of a larger F1 championship that pays large sums of TV money to the winning team, winning or losing one race can contribute to winning or losing an endgame with much more at stake.
Northern Trust offers internal fund accounting, data tools to clients
Regulations and a mandate to enhance quality and transparency in a bid to improve the investor experience are pushing buy-side firms to have more oversight of their third-party providers.
$135.6m fines prompt Citi to modernize infrastructure, controls
The bank was hit with a combined $135.6 million fine on Wednesday for failing to resolve “longstanding internal controls and risk issues,” amid continued internal work across the enterprise.
SocGen pushes data, analytics use cases for SG Markets
The bank is letting a handful of clients experiment with its proprietary data and models to inform their research.
Finra clears hurdle with CAT launch, but several others remain
Two major components of the consolidated audit trail are now in place. But wrangling over the CAT’s future continues.
Ace high or busted flush? Digital Asset’s mixed fortunes mirror DLT adversity
The vendor hoped to remodel post-trade using blockchain technology—and it still might—but its bumpy progress raises questions over the future of DLT in finance.