Trans-Atlantic Regulatory Storms
![michael-shashoua-waters michael-shashoua-waters](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/317/167317/michael-shashoua-waters.JPG.webp?h=acfe3244&itok=ceJMABf4)
This month, Inside Reference Data set out to try and make sense of a dizzying array of regulation whose provisions are still a work in progress or in the process of implementation, and what these will mean for data managers.
The European Union is currently contending with how to handle financial transaction taxes. Its governing body, the European Commission, set out a proposal, and adjusted it in mid-February in an effort to reach agreement from its member nations.
Nonetheless, France and Italy have forged ahead with their own separate transaction tax plans. This means data managers have to figure out what financial instruments are affected by the different tax plans, at least until the Commission catches up. Providers such as Interactive Data and GoldenSource are addressing the complexities presented by the French and Italian plans, but the Commission’s altered tax plan actually covers more types of assets, widening the definition of which assets are “in scope” of the tax rules.
If that isn’t enough for Europeans, there’s also the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) drafted by the European Securities and Markets Authority (Esma), which is likely to complicate legal entity identifier (LEI) proceedings by proposing the use of Bank Identifier Codes rather than the US-generated LEI pre-cursor, CICI (the CFTC Interim Compliant Identifier).
Esma’s identification standard, particularly for counterparty data, is tougher than the CICI, thus creating a likely “separate but unequal” division between US and European data sets. CFTC-registered trade repositories will have to spin-off European cousins to conduct business in Europe, if EMIR proceeds as it currently is written.
Therefore, it’s no wonder, as EDM Works’ Dennis Slattery says in “Dark Clouds for Off-Site Data”, that regulatory compliance concerns are diverting resources from operational changes that could improve reference data management in the form of cloud computing resources.
Small firms are still choosing to use cloud resources out of necessity, but it’s become clear that achieving consistency by addressing interoperability will take more time. This insight is seconded by Wipro Technologies’ Jennifer Ippoliti, who observes in her “Industry Warehouse” column that we are years away from capturing the corporate genome proposed by Thomson Reuters’ Tim Lind.
What our March issue has captured is that the visions are out there for better reference data management through better use of resources and new data management ideas. The circumstances may be an impediment now, but that will change.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Bloomberg, industry bodies push back on Cboe’s proposed OEMS rule change
Some industry bodies disagree with the options exchange’s proposal to carve its Silexx OEMS out of the SEC’s definition of an exchange facility and place it into a separate business line.
Zeros and ones: Industry contemplates T+0 as the next step
With the North American transition to T+1 settlement complete, same-day settlement could be the next goalpost set, though skeptics are many.
The IMD Wrap: Déjà vu as exchange data industry weighs its options
Max highlights some of WatersTechnology’s recent reporting on data costs and capacity issues facing the options industry, and asks, haven’t we seen this before somewhere?
FRTB data quality issues persist amid shifting implementation dates
Banks are finding market and reference data challenges posed by the FRTB’s standardized model tricky, compounded by uncertainty over when the regulation will take effect.
Cboe pushes rule change to make way for proprietary Opra alternatives
As US options data has grown in volume and cost, Cboe says changing the public feed's governing document would make way for more competition from private alternatives, including its Cboe One Options Feed, launched in 2023.
Regulators urged to promote cyber security investment
Public interest in stopping cyber attacks that could trigger bank runs, says Bundesbank researcher
Hong Kong looks for digital response to trade reporting burden
New swaps reporting framework will include more fields than requirements in US or Singapore.
Big questions remain over Dora’s critical third parties
Industry looks for clarity on critical third parties ahead of July 17 regulatory technical standards for the EU’s Digital Operational Resilience Act.