Sifma tells FSOC Chair: More Regulators Must Require LEI
The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (Sifma) has called for more US regulators to mandate the use of the legal entity identifier (LEI), pointing out that only one US regulation currently requires the identifier and the majority of entities that have registered for LEIs are European.
In an open letter, Kenneth Bentsen, Sifma's president and CEO, calls on Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew to use his position as chairperson of the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) "to advocate for a more fulsome adoption and use by the US regulatory community of the LEI."
The letter emphasizes that Europe has outstripped the US in terms of the number of LEIs issued, with 60% of all LEIs issued to European entities and 28% issued to US entities. The letter points out that in the US, only the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's (CFTC) Swap Data Recordkeeping and Reporting rules require the LEI.
The letter states: "We believe the FSOC and its members can and should play a key role in expanding the US adoption of the LEI and its related benefits by requiring LEIs to be used broadly in US regulatory reporting and other supervisory practices."
Tom Price, Sifma's New York-based managing director, operations and technology, tells Inside Reference Data that all regulators on the FSOC should require use of the LEI. "I don't want to point to a particular rule, but I can point to particular regulators," says Price. "All of the banking regulators, in my view, should be using the LEI, the Securities and Exchange Commission should be using it, and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority should be using it. So all of the regulators within the US should be using the LEI standard."
Price says Sifma is surprised the LEI has not been adopted more widely in the US, but applauded the progress made in Europe. "It is great to see that there has been good, steady adoption of the LEI globally, and I applaud and point to Europe as leading on this initiative," he says. "What we would like is to see more adoption here in the US, and we are hopeful that Secretary Lew, as chair of the FSOC, will ultimately encourage the use of the LEI by the members of the FSOC."
Inside Reference Data's requests for a response from Lew were unsuccessful. However, the Treasury has previously expressed its support for universal adoption of the LEI by regulators.
In a speech at the Exchequer Club in Washington on October 16, Richard Berner, director of the Treasury's Office of Financial Research, said: "Using the LEI is still largely voluntary. And like it or not, standards work best when they are universal, like the bar code system. Thus, in my view, the time has come for regulators around the world to require companies to use the LEI in reporting financial data. True, in the US and Europe, regulators require that the LEI be used for swap reporting. To be effective, however, the LEI should be ubiquitous."
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Removal of Chevron spells t-r-o-u-b-l-e for the C-A-T
Citadel Securities and the American Securities Association are suing the SEC to limit the Consolidated Audit Trail, and their case may be aided by the removal of a key piece of the agency’s legislative power earlier this year.
BlackRock, BNY see T+1 success in industry collaboration, old frameworks
Industry testing and lessons from the last settlement change from T+3 to T+2 were some of the components that made the May transition run smoothly.
How ‘Bond gadgets’ make tackling data easier for regulators and traders
The IMD Wrap: Everyone loves the hype around AI, especially financial firms. And now, even regulators are getting in on the act. But first... “The name’s Bond; J-AI-mes Bond”
Can the EU and UK reach T+1 together?
Prompted by the North American migration, both jurisdictions are drawing up guidelines for reaching next-day settlement.
Waters Wavelength Ep. 293: Reference Data Drama
Tony and Reb discuss the Financial Data Transparency Act's proposed rules around identifiers and the industry reaction.
Clearing houses fear being classified as DORA third parties
As the 2025 deadline looms, CCP and exchange members are seeking risk information that’s usually deemed confidential.
Industry not sold on FIGI mandate for US reg reporting
Banks’ and asset managers’ tortured relationship with Cusip numbers remains tortured, as they tell regulators to keep the taxonomy in play.
T+1 shift sees out-of-hours human resourcing costs spike by as much as 20%
New research finds that trading firms are experiencing increased labor costs—which could be a boon for outsourced trading.