Third Time’s the Charm?

Can the SPReD reference data utility succeed where others before it have floundered?

max-bowie

With no associated profit stream, there’s also no competitive advantage to repeating those same thankless tasks at each individual firm across the industry, which is why certain aspects of reference data make perfect sense to be managed via a utility model where everyone can share in the cost efficiencies and scale of one large entity performing the same tasks on everyone’s behalf, rather than every firm wasting time and resources duplicating what everyone else has already done. Or, to put it another way, “streamline redundant, costly activities that are mandated for industry participants,” that add burden without adding any value, says Amy Young, managing director at State Street. In fact, unlike keeping these functions in-house, offloading them can contribute to profit streams, because it allows firms to reallocate resources to product development, customer service, and other revenue-generating areas.

Of course, SPReD isn’t the first utility to come along in the reference data arena: SunGard and a partnership between Accenture and Asset Control have both dipped their toes in the utilities pool and floundered. But that doesn’t mean SPReD will share their fate. First, because utilities are actually accepted and widespread elsewhere—Swift or DTCC, for example—and second, because SPReD’s founding partners Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan and Morgan Stanley each have a vested interest in its success, if only so it continues to provide them with the benefit of offloading costly and resource-intensive parts of their reference data management. If these bulge-bracket firms can cajole just a fraction of their clients and counterparties to also use SPReD, they can probably feel pretty secure in their investment and confident of continued service.

But takeup isn’t the only challenge to success: The utility model also depends on the vendors who provide the underlying information being willing to play ball and be flexible with their commercial models if the utility is to achieve economies of scale. So far, Thomson Reuters is on board. The question is, say end-users, will other vendors follow? 

 

Max Bowie, Executive Editor, Inside Market Data and Inside Reference Data

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.

The AI boom proves a boon for chief data officers

Voice of the CDO: As trading firms incorporate AI and large language models into their investment workflows, there’s a growing realization among firms that their data governance structures are riddled with holes. Enter the chief data officer.

If M&A picks up, who’s on the auction block?

Waters Wrap: With projections that mergers and acquisitions are geared to pick back up in 2025, Anthony reads the tea leaves of 25 of this year’s deals to predict which vendors might be most valuable.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a WatersTechnology account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here