Fixed Income special report
![imd-fixed-income-report-june2013 imd-fixed-income-report-june2013](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/907/261907/imd-fixed-income-report-june2013-580x358.JPG.webp?itok=iNpRcAbp)
Click here to download the PDF
Bonds Automation is About Quality, Not Speed
If you look up "bond" in a dictionary, the first definition refers to restraints designed to hold someone prisoner. The second describes a "binding" covenant, with the explanation of fixed income instruments some way down the list. But it's worth keeping these definitions in mind: Fixed income assets were never designed to be traded in a high-frequency environment-they were intended to be held in return for agreed payouts over time-but are now undergoing an automation revolution.
High-frequency bond markets may still be some way off, even if more attention is now typically paid to a bond's price than its yield. But that isn't stopping firms wanting to apply more automated models to the most liquid classes of bonds. Automating basic trade flow saves money, allows firms to focus on more complex deals, supports the growth of higher-frequency trading and enables firms to offload data intensive and time-sensitive strategies to machines that can execute trades faster.
As complex bond pricing becomes more automated, compute power demand intensifies, while for the most liquid classes, reducing latency to the execution venue becomes more important. That's where datacenter providers like Equinix come in, providing the space and connectivity for trading firms, and often hosting the matching engines of the marketplaces themselves. In fact, as fixed income moves more to an exchange-like, centrally-cleared order book model, these datacenters will become the key meeting places for traders, replacing the handshake, phone call, or electronic request-for-quote model.
These more transparent, exchange-like marketplaces will by their nature generate better quality market data. But the need for more transparent, frequent and better-quality fixed income pricing is ubiquitous. Whether you trade once a day or multiple times a second, knowing that the price you are trading on s timely, accurate and executable is key, so that the pre-crisis gaps between valuations and reality are never repeated.
Of course, the fixed income markets include a range of unique features and complexities. One such additional complexity is the attribution process, which requires that firms have a firm grasp of all relevant data points, and implement the correct processes and technology platforms, as outlined by Christophe Volard of BI-SAM later in this report. And as the fixed income markets inexorably move towards a model of increased automation, these systems choices will become more important to a firm's success in this evolving electronic landscape.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
Industry seeks to avoid future clashes over data costs
The IMD Wrap: Max wonders when and why buying data became a blood sport.
Facing platform shutdown, former IEX Cloud head buys its assets in 11th-hour bid
Tim Baker, Pedro Aguayo, and a silent partner have come together to purchase IEX Cloud’s assets days before the exchange was to retire all its products on August 31.
New working group to create open framework for managing rising market data costs
Substantive Research is putting together a working group of market data-consuming firms with the aim of crafting quantitative metrics for market data cost avoidance.
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Back to basics: Data management woes continue for the buy side
Data management platform Fencore helps investment managers resolve symptoms of not having a central data layer.
‘Feature, not a bug’: Bloomberg makes the case for Figi
Bloomberg created the Figi identifier, but ceded all its rights to the Object Management Group 10 years ago. Here, Bloomberg’s Richard Robinson and Steve Meizanis write to dispel what they believe to be misconceptions about Figi and the FDTA.
SS&C builds data mesh to unite acquired platforms
The vendor is using GenAI and APIs as part of the ongoing project.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.