UBS Stung with Record Fine for Libor Manipulation
The FSA's indictment, distributed earlier this morning, accuses UBS of systematically manipulating the benchmark rates over a period of five years and colluding with other market participants in order to do so, benefiting its own trading results. The regulator said that it found 2,000 cases of documented requests for rate fixing, and also revealed that an "unquantifiable" number of oral requests were also made.
Libor and Euribor are benchmark rates that essentially determine how banks lend to one another, and are calculated by Thomson Reuters on a daily basis, overseen by the British Bankers' Association in London, after submission from panel institutions. As well as setting loan conditions between banks, many retail financial products, such as mortgages and loans, derive their interest rate from a fixed amount plus Libor.
Given the widespread nature of the case, the FSA said that every submission made for Libor and Euribor by UBS during this period is suspect. Although UBS split its trading and submitting roles in 2009, its systems and compliance function were unable to detect requests for manipulation, which used codewords. The FSA said that up to 45 individuals, including traders and senior managers, had direct knowledge of the activity.
A damning section of the release also stated that, in order to encourage interdealer brokers to help affect other panel banks' submissions for Japanese Yen (JPY), corrupt brokerage payments were made through so-called wash trades. These trades are essentially risk-free and contain little commercial benefit, serving instead to transfer money through brokerage commission payments.
Although UBS did not qualify for the full 30 percent discount for settlement, it did gain a 20 percent mark down, which otherwise would have raised the fine to £200 million (approximately $388 million). It is the largest financial penalty ever levied by the UK regulator, which is being split into two component parts in 2013.
Although UBS did not qualify for the full 30 percent discount for settlement, it did gain a 20 percent mark down, which otherwise would have raised the fine to £200 million
"The findings we have set out in our notice today do not make for pretty reading," says Tracy McDermott, director of enforcement and financial crime at the FSA. "The integrity of benchmarks such as Libor and Euribor are of fundamental importance to both UK and international financial markets. UBS traders and managers ignored this. They manipulated UBS's submissions in order to benefit their own positions and to protect UBS's reputation, showing a total disregard for the millions of market participants around the world who were also affected by Libor and Euribor. UBS's misconduct was all the more serious because of the orchestrated attempts to manipulate the JPY Libor submissions of other banks, as well as its own, and the collusion with interdealer brokers and other panel banks in coordinated efforts to manipulate the fix.
"Over an extended period UBS allowed this to happen through its failure to control its business appropriately to ensure that Libor and Euribor submissions properly reflected the relevant requirements. There should be no doubt about how seriously the FSA views these failings. This is our largest penalty to date and demonstrates our commitment to ensuring that those in the wholesale markets do not put their own interests above those of the markets as a whole," McDermott continued
The FSA settlement was part of a wider fine regime with other regulators, which has so far totalled around £940 million (approximately $1.8 billion) in fines for UBS. This figure comes despite immunity from some regulators for cooperation in the early stages of the investigation. More banks are expected to be fined over Libor and Euribor in the coming days.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
In 2025, keep reference data weird
The SEC, ESMA, CFTC and other acronyms provided the drama in reference data this year, including in crypto.
Asset manager Saratoga uses AI to accelerate Ridgeline rollout
The tech provider’s AI assistant helps clients summarize research, client interactions, report generation, as well as interact with the Ridgeline platform.
CDOs evolve from traffic cops to purveyors of rocket fuel
As firms start to recognize the inherent value of data, will CDOs—those who safeguard and control access to data—finally get the recognition they deserve?
It’s just semantics: The web standard that could replace the identifiers you love to hate
Data ontologists say that the IRI, a cousin of the humble URL, could put the various wars over identity resolution to bed—for good.
The art of communication: Data pros need better messaging
As the CDO of a tier-one bank puts it, when there’s an imbalance in communication between the data organization and the business (much less other technology heads) “that creates problems.”
Does TP Icap-AWS deal signal the next stage in financial cloud migration?
The IMD Wrap: Amazon’s deal with TP Icap could have been a simple renewal. Instead, it’s the stepping stone towards cloudifying other marketplace operators—and their clients.
T. Rowe Price’s Tasitsiomi on the pitfalls of data and the allures of AI
The asset manager’s head of AI and investments data science gets candid on the hype around generative AI and data transparency.
Waters Wavelength Ep. 298: GenAI in market data, and everything reference data
Reb is back on the podcast to discuss licensing sticking points for market and reference data.