The Buy Side as Big Data Laggards

anthony-malakian-waters
Anthony Malakian, US Editor, WatersTechnology

Big Data seems to be more of a sell-side issue than a buy-side one. Over the last year, the WatersTechnology brands have produced numerous webcasts, special reports and conferences in an attempt to dive deep into Big Data.

The most recent was Tuesday's Big Data Online Summit—something new for us—a virtual conference with panels, video presentations, case studies, and virtual booths where people were able to chat online with representatives and download information about the exhibiting company.

At the online event, I noticed most of the insight and innovative strategies to tackle Big Data coming from large tier-one investment banks, as well as vendors that cater more to the sell side. This may be due in part to selection bias—we produce these materials and conferences—but I talk regularly with a number of hedge funds and asset managers, and this topic is rarely on the tips of their tongues.

In a virtual chat room I asked someone from Barclays Capital if he noticed the same thing. He said he had, and added that the sell side is going to be “more creative in how they use recent developments in tech and situations." The buy side, it seems, has all but given up trying to deal with the deluge of news coming across their desks ... and that was before Twitter exploded three years ago.

At the same time, sell-side firms have been struggling to come up with new ways to find alpha as equity trading volumes fall, and direct market access cuts into commissions. So it's up to the sell side to lead the charge on this. And the buy side has been incentivizing sell-side firms to innovate by "dangling future commissions” in front of them, the Barclays professional said.

So my question is this: Is it worth it for the buy side to step up its Big Data innovation? After all, a firm that can figure out how to successfully mine and analyze a massive, unstructured dataset could gain a competitive advantage when it comes to communications with investors and in identifying trends and sentiments around which to build a trading strategy. On the other hand, is it simply not worth the expense and resources, considering that buy-side firms are already running on skeleton crews when it comes to IT?

If you have an opinion on this, send me an email at anthony.malakian@incisivemedia.com or call me at +1 646-490-3973.

 

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.

The AI boom proves a boon for chief data officers

Voice of the CDO: As trading firms incorporate AI and large language models into their investment workflows, there’s a growing realization among firms that their data governance structures are riddled with holes. Enter the chief data officer.

If M&A picks up, who’s on the auction block?

Waters Wrap: With projections that mergers and acquisitions are geared to pick back up in 2025, Anthony reads the tea leaves of 25 of this year’s deals to predict which vendors might be most valuable.

Removal of Chevron spells t-r-o-u-b-l-e for the C-A-T

Citadel Securities and the American Securities Association are suing the SEC to limit the Consolidated Audit Trail, and their case may be aided by the removal of a key piece of the agency’s legislative power earlier this year.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a WatersTechnology account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here